In May 2022, the most widespread outbreak of sustained transmission of mpox outside of countries historically affected countries in Western and Central Africa occurred. We aimed to examine the personal and clinical experiences of international healthcare workers (HCWs) during this public health emergency. We conducted an international cross-sectional survey study between August and October 2022, examining the experiences and perceptions of HCWs clinically involved in the 2022 mpox response. Respondents were recruited via an international network of sexual health and HIV clinicians responding to mpox and promoted through clinical associations and social media. Survey domains included: clinical workload; preparedness; training and support at work; psychological well-being and vaccination. 725 multi-national healthcare workers across 41 countries were included in the analysis. 91% were physicians specialised in Sexual Health or Infectious Diseases; with 34% (n = 247) of all respondents involved in mpox policy. A substantial proportion of respondents (n = 296, 41%) reported working longer hours during the mpox outbreak, with no concomitant removal of other clinical responsibilities. 30% (n = 218) of respondents reported that they had never heard of mpox before the outbreak and over 25% of the respondents reported that they had misdiagnosed someone initially. This culminated in a high prevalence of moral distress at thirty percent. Less than 9% of HCWs in the region of the Caribbean, Central America and South America had been offered a vaccine as compared to almost one-third in the other regions. Where offered, there were high levels of uptake across all regions. The findings highlight a critical need for addressing the profound gaps in HCW knowledge about re-emerging diseases with pandemic potential. Strengthening the resilience of global health systems and prioritising internationally coordinated approaches to global vaccine deployment is imperative.

International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak / Apea, Vanessa; Titanji, Boghuma K.; Dakin, Francesca H.; Hayes, Rosalie; Smuk, Melanie; Kawu, Habiba; Waters, Laura; Levy, Itsik; Kuritzkes, Daniel R.; Gandhi, Monica; Rockstroh, Jürgen; Schechter, Mauro; Holt, Martin; Palich, Romain; Cortes, Claudia P.; Nozza, Silvia; Mussini, Cristina; Calmy, Alexandra; Crabtree-Ramirez, Brenda E.; Blanco, José L.; Bhagani, Sanjay; Dewsnap, Claire; Orkin, Chloe; Null, Null. - In: PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 2767-3375. - 5:2(2025), pp. 1-12. [10.1371/journal.pgph.0003704]

International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak

Mussini, Cristina;
2025

Abstract

In May 2022, the most widespread outbreak of sustained transmission of mpox outside of countries historically affected countries in Western and Central Africa occurred. We aimed to examine the personal and clinical experiences of international healthcare workers (HCWs) during this public health emergency. We conducted an international cross-sectional survey study between August and October 2022, examining the experiences and perceptions of HCWs clinically involved in the 2022 mpox response. Respondents were recruited via an international network of sexual health and HIV clinicians responding to mpox and promoted through clinical associations and social media. Survey domains included: clinical workload; preparedness; training and support at work; psychological well-being and vaccination. 725 multi-national healthcare workers across 41 countries were included in the analysis. 91% were physicians specialised in Sexual Health or Infectious Diseases; with 34% (n = 247) of all respondents involved in mpox policy. A substantial proportion of respondents (n = 296, 41%) reported working longer hours during the mpox outbreak, with no concomitant removal of other clinical responsibilities. 30% (n = 218) of respondents reported that they had never heard of mpox before the outbreak and over 25% of the respondents reported that they had misdiagnosed someone initially. This culminated in a high prevalence of moral distress at thirty percent. Less than 9% of HCWs in the region of the Caribbean, Central America and South America had been offered a vaccine as compared to almost one-third in the other regions. Where offered, there were high levels of uptake across all regions. The findings highlight a critical need for addressing the profound gaps in HCW knowledge about re-emerging diseases with pandemic potential. Strengthening the resilience of global health systems and prioritising internationally coordinated approaches to global vaccine deployment is imperative.
2025
5
2
1
12
International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak / Apea, Vanessa; Titanji, Boghuma K.; Dakin, Francesca H.; Hayes, Rosalie; Smuk, Melanie; Kawu, Habiba; Waters, Laura; Levy, Itsik; Kuritzkes, Daniel R.; Gandhi, Monica; Rockstroh, Jürgen; Schechter, Mauro; Holt, Martin; Palich, Romain; Cortes, Claudia P.; Nozza, Silvia; Mussini, Cristina; Calmy, Alexandra; Crabtree-Ramirez, Brenda E.; Blanco, José L.; Bhagani, Sanjay; Dewsnap, Claire; Orkin, Chloe; Null, Null. - In: PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 2767-3375. - 5:2(2025), pp. 1-12. [10.1371/journal.pgph.0003704]
Apea, Vanessa; Titanji, Boghuma K.; Dakin, Francesca H.; Hayes, Rosalie; Smuk, Melanie; Kawu, Habiba; Waters, Laura; Levy, Itsik; Kuritzkes, Daniel R....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pgph.0003704.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 575.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
575.49 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1374652
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact