We aimed to investigate controversial pediatric urolithiasis issues systematically, integrating expert consensus and comprehensive guidelines reviews. Methods: Two semi-structured online focus group meetings were conducted to discuss the study’s need and content, review current literature, and prepare the initial survey. Data were collected through surveys and focus group discussions. Existing guidelines were reviewed, and a second survey was conducted using the Delphi method to validate findings and facilitate consensus. The primary outcome measures investigated controversial issues, integrating expert consensus and guideline reviews. Results: Experts from 15 countries participated, including 20 with 16+ years of experience, 2 with 11–15 years, and 4 with 6–10 years. The initial survey identified nine main themes, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols and tailored treatments. Inter-rater reliability was high, with controversies in treatment approaches (score 4.6, 92% agreement), follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement), and diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement). The second survey underscored the critical need for consensus on identification, diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement), and standardized follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement). Conclusion: The importance of personalized treatment in pediatric urolithiasis is clear. Prioritizing low-radiation diagnostic tools, effectively managing residual stone fragments, and standardized follow-up protocols are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Integrating new technologies while ensuring safety and reliability is also essential. Harmonizing guidelines across regions can provide consistent and effective management. Future efforts should focus on collaborative research, specialized training, and the integration of new technologies in treatment protocols. © The Author(s) 2024.
Correction: Consensus statement addressing controversies and guidelines on pediatric urolithiasis (World Journal of Urology, (2024), 42, 1, (473), 10.1007/s00345-024-05161-4) / Güven, S.; Tokas, T.; Tozsin, A.; Haid, B.; Lendvay, T. S.; Silay, S.; Mohan, V. C.; Cansino, J. R.; Saulat, S.; Straub, M.; Bujons Tur, A.; Akgül, B.; Samotyjek, J.; Lusuardi, L.; Ferretti, S.; Cavdar, O. F.; Ortner, G.; Sultan, S.; Choong, S.; Micali, S.; Saltirov, I.; Sezer, A.; Netsch, C.; de Lorenzis, E.; Cakir, O. O.; Zeng, G.; Gozen, A. S.; Bianchi, G.; Jurkiewicz, B.; Knoll, T.; Rassweiler, J.; Ahmed &, K.; Sarica, K.. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 1433-8726. - 42:1(2024), pp. 473-473. [10.1007/s00345-024-05282-w]
Correction: Consensus statement addressing controversies and guidelines on pediatric urolithiasis (World Journal of Urology, (2024), 42, 1, (473), 10.1007/s00345-024-05161-4)
S. Micali;G. Bianchi;
2024
Abstract
We aimed to investigate controversial pediatric urolithiasis issues systematically, integrating expert consensus and comprehensive guidelines reviews. Methods: Two semi-structured online focus group meetings were conducted to discuss the study’s need and content, review current literature, and prepare the initial survey. Data were collected through surveys and focus group discussions. Existing guidelines were reviewed, and a second survey was conducted using the Delphi method to validate findings and facilitate consensus. The primary outcome measures investigated controversial issues, integrating expert consensus and guideline reviews. Results: Experts from 15 countries participated, including 20 with 16+ years of experience, 2 with 11–15 years, and 4 with 6–10 years. The initial survey identified nine main themes, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols and tailored treatments. Inter-rater reliability was high, with controversies in treatment approaches (score 4.6, 92% agreement), follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement), and diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement). The second survey underscored the critical need for consensus on identification, diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement), and standardized follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement). Conclusion: The importance of personalized treatment in pediatric urolithiasis is clear. Prioritizing low-radiation diagnostic tools, effectively managing residual stone fragments, and standardized follow-up protocols are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Integrating new technologies while ensuring safety and reliability is also essential. Harmonizing guidelines across regions can provide consistent and effective management. Future efforts should focus on collaborative research, specialized training, and the integration of new technologies in treatment protocols. © The Author(s) 2024.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
s00345-024-05282-w.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
446.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
446.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris