Purpose: This study quantifies the impact on budget and cost per health benefit of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in place of digital mammography (DM) for breast cancer screening among asymptomatic women in Italy. Methods: A budget impact analysis and a cost consequence analysis were conducted using parameters from the MAITA project and literature. The study considered four scenarios for DBT implementation, i.e., DBT for all women, DBT for women aged 45–49 years, DBT based on breast density (BI-RADS C + D or D only), and compared these to the current DM screening. Healthcare provider's perspective was adopted, including screening, diagnosis, and cancer treatment costs. Results: Introducing DBT for all women would increase overall screening costs by 20%. Targeting DBT to women aged 45–49 years or with dense breasts would result in smaller cost increases (3.2% for age-based and 1.4–10.7% for density-based scenarios). The cost per avoided interval cancer was significantly higher when DBT was applied to all women compared to targeted approaches. The cost per gained early-detected cancer slightly increases in targeted approaches, while the assumptions on the clinical significance and overdiagnosis of cancers detected by DBT and not by DM have a strong impact. Conclusions: Implementing DBT as a primary breast cancer test in screening programs in Italy would lead to a substantial increase in costs. Tailoring DBT use to women aged 45–49 or with dense breasts could enhance the feasibility and sustainability of the intervention. Further research is needed to clarify the impact of DBT on overdiagnosis and the long-term outcomes.
Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy / Djuric, O.; Deandrea, S.; Mantellini, P.; Sardanelli, F.; Venturelli, F.; Montemezzi, S.; Vecchio, R.; Bucchi, L.; Senore, C.; Giordano, L.; Paci, E.; Bonifacino, A.; Calabrese, M.; Caumo, F.; Degrassi, F.; Sassoli de' Bianchi, P.; Battisti, F.; Zappa, M.; Pattacini, P.; Campari, C.; Nitrosi, A.; Di Leo, G.; Frigerio, A.; Magni, V.; Fornasa, F.; Romanucci, G.; Falini, P.; Auzzi, N.; Armaroli, P.; Giorgi Rossi, P.; Falcini, F.; Lang, K.; Graewingholt, A.; Duffy, S. W.; Vergini, V.; Pitarella, S.; Casella, D.; Riggi, E.; Castellano, I.; Di Leo, A.; Artuso, F.; Milanesio, L.; Marra, V.; Correale, L.; Ponti, A.; Segnan, N.; Presti, P.; Falco, P.; Dettori, D.; Favettini, E.; Ferraris, R.; Menicagli, L.; Benedek, A.; Schiaffino, S.; Monaco, C. G.; Spinelli, D.; Cozzi, A.; Carbonaro, L. A.; Regini, F.; Peruzzi, F.; Ciuffi, F.; Betti, E.; Busoni, S.; Cavazza, E.; Tramalloni, D.; Degl'Innocenti, C.; Verdi, S.; Puliti, D.; Mazzalupo, V.; Carnesciali, E.; Iossa, A.; Ambrogetti, D.; Rossati, C.; Martello, G.; Lucchi, I.; Bonelli, E.; Davoli, E.; Lonetti, J.; Pezzarossi, A.; Braghiroli, M. B.; Vicentini, M.; Mancuso, P.; Cavuto, S.; Braglia, L.; Caroli, S.; Vacondio, R.; Ravaioli, S.; Ginocchi, V.; Iotti, V.; Giorgi Rossi, P.; Ragazzi, M.; Bertolini, M.; Boschini, M.; Colli, M.; Canovi, L.; Marchesi, V.; Caffarri, S.; Beretti, F.; Tondelli, G.; Stefanelli, G.; Pescarolo, M.; Coriani, C.; Stefano, F.; Pietribiasi, F.; Pedilarco, S.; Pau, L.; Parmelli, E.; Moschetta, M.; Carnesciali, E.; Capobussi, M.; Brancato, B.; Bonvicini, L.; Ambrogetti, D.. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 0033-8362. - 129:9(2024), pp. 1288-1302. [10.1007/s11547-024-01850-7]
Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy
Venturelli F.;Ragazzi M.;
2024
Abstract
Purpose: This study quantifies the impact on budget and cost per health benefit of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in place of digital mammography (DM) for breast cancer screening among asymptomatic women in Italy. Methods: A budget impact analysis and a cost consequence analysis were conducted using parameters from the MAITA project and literature. The study considered four scenarios for DBT implementation, i.e., DBT for all women, DBT for women aged 45–49 years, DBT based on breast density (BI-RADS C + D or D only), and compared these to the current DM screening. Healthcare provider's perspective was adopted, including screening, diagnosis, and cancer treatment costs. Results: Introducing DBT for all women would increase overall screening costs by 20%. Targeting DBT to women aged 45–49 years or with dense breasts would result in smaller cost increases (3.2% for age-based and 1.4–10.7% for density-based scenarios). The cost per avoided interval cancer was significantly higher when DBT was applied to all women compared to targeted approaches. The cost per gained early-detected cancer slightly increases in targeted approaches, while the assumptions on the clinical significance and overdiagnosis of cancers detected by DBT and not by DM have a strong impact. Conclusions: Implementing DBT as a primary breast cancer test in screening programs in Italy would lead to a substantial increase in costs. Tailoring DBT use to women aged 45–49 or with dense breasts could enhance the feasibility and sustainability of the intervention. Further research is needed to clarify the impact of DBT on overdiagnosis and the long-term outcomes.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris
