In this paper, we describe the strategies used by our team, MLFC, that led us to achieve the 2nd place in the 15th edition of the Multi-Agent Programming Contest. The scenario used in the contest is an extension of the previous edition (14th ) “Agents Assemble” wherein two teams of agents move around a 2D grid and compete to assemble complex block structures. We discuss the languages and tools used during the development of our team. Then, we summarise the main strategies that were carried over from our previous participation in the 14th edition and list the limitations (if any) of using these strategies in the latest contest edition. We also developed new strategies that were made specifically for the extended scenario: cartography (determining the size of the map); formal verification of the map merging protocol (to provide assurances that it works when increasing the number of agents); plan cache (efficiently scaling the number of planners); task achievement (forming groups of agents to achieve tasks); and bullies (agents that focus on stopping agents from the opposing team). Finally, we give a brief overview of our performance in the contest and discuss what we believe were our shortcomings.

MLFC: From 10 to 50 Planners in the Multi-Agent Programming Contest / Cardoso, R. C.; Ferrando, A.; Papacchini, F.; Luckcuck, M.; Linker, S.; Payne, T. R.. - 12947:(2021), pp. 82-107. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th Annual Multi-Agent Programming Contest, MAPC 2021 tenutosi a na nel 2021) [10.1007/978-3-030-88549-6_4].

MLFC: From 10 to 50 Planners in the Multi-Agent Programming Contest

Ferrando A.;
2021

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the strategies used by our team, MLFC, that led us to achieve the 2nd place in the 15th edition of the Multi-Agent Programming Contest. The scenario used in the contest is an extension of the previous edition (14th ) “Agents Assemble” wherein two teams of agents move around a 2D grid and compete to assemble complex block structures. We discuss the languages and tools used during the development of our team. Then, we summarise the main strategies that were carried over from our previous participation in the 14th edition and list the limitations (if any) of using these strategies in the latest contest edition. We also developed new strategies that were made specifically for the extended scenario: cartography (determining the size of the map); formal verification of the map merging protocol (to provide assurances that it works when increasing the number of agents); plan cache (efficiently scaling the number of planners); task achievement (forming groups of agents to achieve tasks); and bullies (agents that focus on stopping agents from the opposing team). Finally, we give a brief overview of our performance in the contest and discuss what we believe were our shortcomings.
2021
15th Annual Multi-Agent Programming Contest, MAPC 2021
na
2021
12947
82
107
Cardoso, R. C.; Ferrando, A.; Papacchini, F.; Luckcuck, M.; Linker, S.; Payne, T. R.
MLFC: From 10 to 50 Planners in the Multi-Agent Programming Contest / Cardoso, R. C.; Ferrando, A.; Papacchini, F.; Luckcuck, M.; Linker, S.; Payne, T. R.. - 12947:(2021), pp. 82-107. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th Annual Multi-Agent Programming Contest, MAPC 2021 tenutosi a na nel 2021) [10.1007/978-3-030-88549-6_4].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2110.08172.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 266.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
266.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1331862
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact