We study two different governance modes of university-industry interactions: in the institutional mode, interactions are mediated by the university through its administrative structures (such as departments or dedicated units such as technology transfer offices), while in the personal contractual mode interactions involve formal and binding contractual agreements between firms and individual academics, carried out without the direct involvement of the university. We argue that the choice of which form of governance to adopt involves different decision-making processes for firms and that both governance forms have important roles to play in the context of university-industry knowledge transfer. Relying on a representative sample of firms in the Italian region of Piedmont, we examine the characteristics and strategies of firms that interact with universities under different governance modes. Our results indicate that ignoring personal contractual arrangements with individual researchers, as the previous literature does, amounts to overlooking at least 50% of university-industry interactions. The econometric estimations suggest that personal contractual interactions are used relatively more by small firms involved in technology and open innovation strategies, while institutional interactions are mostly used by large firms that vertically integrate R&D activities. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions / Bodas Freitas, I. M.; Geuna, A.; Rossi, F.. - In: RESEARCH POLICY. - ISSN 0048-7333. - 42:1(2013), pp. 50-62. [10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007]

Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions

Rossi F.
2013

Abstract

We study two different governance modes of university-industry interactions: in the institutional mode, interactions are mediated by the university through its administrative structures (such as departments or dedicated units such as technology transfer offices), while in the personal contractual mode interactions involve formal and binding contractual agreements between firms and individual academics, carried out without the direct involvement of the university. We argue that the choice of which form of governance to adopt involves different decision-making processes for firms and that both governance forms have important roles to play in the context of university-industry knowledge transfer. Relying on a representative sample of firms in the Italian region of Piedmont, we examine the characteristics and strategies of firms that interact with universities under different governance modes. Our results indicate that ignoring personal contractual arrangements with individual researchers, as the previous literature does, amounts to overlooking at least 50% of university-industry interactions. The econometric estimations suggest that personal contractual interactions are used relatively more by small firms involved in technology and open innovation strategies, while institutional interactions are mostly used by large firms that vertically integrate R&D activities. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
2013
42
1
50
62
Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions / Bodas Freitas, I. M.; Geuna, A.; Rossi, F.. - In: RESEARCH POLICY. - ISSN 0048-7333. - 42:1(2013), pp. 50-62. [10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007]
Bodas Freitas, I. M.; Geuna, A.; Rossi, F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1327911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 146
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 111
social impact