Is there a reduced confidence towards direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients scheduled for an elective electrical cardioversion? The results of the BLITZ-AF study

Objective: To study the confidence of cardiologists in performing an electrical cardioversion in patients on oral anticoagulation (OA) with or without transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). Methods: Data about atrial fibrillation (AF) patients admitted to cardiology wards for elective cardioversion (ECV) were extrapolated from the BLITZ-AF study. Percentage of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and heparin prescription were analysed in relation to the use of TOE before ECV. Results: Overall rate of TOE was 33.7% (240/713); it was used before ECV in 124/313 (39.6%) of DOACs patients and in 96/372 (25.8%) of the patients on VKAs, showing a significant reduced resort to TOE in VKAs patients (p = 0.0001). Among non-valvular patients TOE was more frequently performed in males, at younger ages and in patients on heparin when compared to patients treated with OA. TOE was also more frequently performed in tertiary hospitals and in hospitals with cardiology wards and electrophysiology labs, when compared to hospital provided only with cardiology wards. At multivariable analysis there was a significant less recourse to TOE in patients on VKAs (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.33–0.67) and higher recourse in the heparin group (OR: 3.85; 95% CI:1.59–9.28) with respect to patients on DOACs; a higher recourse to TOE was observed also in tertiary hospitals (OR 4.25; 95% CI 2.69–6.69) and in hospitals with cardiology wards and electrophysiology (EP) labs (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.23–2.82). Conclusion: our study shows the reluctance in cardioverting patients on DOACs respect to VKAs without a previous TOE, despite adequate anticoagulant treatment.