We explored the morphological organization of the skull within Crocodylidae, analyzing functional and phylogenetic interactions between its 2 constituent functional modules: the rostrum and the postrostrum. We used geometric morphometrics to identify localized shape changes, focusing on the differences between the major clades of the crown-group Crocodylia: Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae. We used published bite performance data to correlate rostral function with postrostral morphology. The skull modules appear more integrated within Alligatoridae than within Crocodyliade. Phylogenetic effects on shape variation are more evident in Alligatoridae than in Crocodylidae, where functional parameters concerning the rostral morphology are proportionally more important than phylogeny. Long-snouted species are characterized by low structural performance, which is significantly associated with a reduction of the pterygoid-quadrate cranial nipper, suggesting that the nipper is important for the ingestion of large food items in generalist species. This functional association is coupled with a significant evolutionary allometry at the clade level, while Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae show different degrees of evolutionary allometry for their entire shape and rostrum. The postrostrum is more conservative than the rostrum in terms of morphospace occupation, evolutionary allometry and phylogenetic signal.

Morphological integration and functional modularity in the crocodilian skull / Piras, P; Buscalioni, Ad; Teresi, L; Raia, P; Sansalone, G; Kotsakis, T; Cubo, J. - In: INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY. - ISSN 1749-4877. - 9:4(2014), pp. 498-516. [10.1111/1749-4877.12062]

Morphological integration and functional modularity in the crocodilian skull

Sansalone G;
2014

Abstract

We explored the morphological organization of the skull within Crocodylidae, analyzing functional and phylogenetic interactions between its 2 constituent functional modules: the rostrum and the postrostrum. We used geometric morphometrics to identify localized shape changes, focusing on the differences between the major clades of the crown-group Crocodylia: Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae. We used published bite performance data to correlate rostral function with postrostral morphology. The skull modules appear more integrated within Alligatoridae than within Crocodyliade. Phylogenetic effects on shape variation are more evident in Alligatoridae than in Crocodylidae, where functional parameters concerning the rostral morphology are proportionally more important than phylogeny. Long-snouted species are characterized by low structural performance, which is significantly associated with a reduction of the pterygoid-quadrate cranial nipper, suggesting that the nipper is important for the ingestion of large food items in generalist species. This functional association is coupled with a significant evolutionary allometry at the clade level, while Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae show different degrees of evolutionary allometry for their entire shape and rostrum. The postrostrum is more conservative than the rostrum in terms of morphospace occupation, evolutionary allometry and phylogenetic signal.
2014
9
4
498
516
Morphological integration and functional modularity in the crocodilian skull / Piras, P; Buscalioni, Ad; Teresi, L; Raia, P; Sansalone, G; Kotsakis, T; Cubo, J. - In: INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY. - ISSN 1749-4877. - 9:4(2014), pp. 498-516. [10.1111/1749-4877.12062]
Piras, P; Buscalioni, Ad; Teresi, L; Raia, P; Sansalone, G; Kotsakis, T; Cubo, J
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1318349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact