Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work.

Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines / Marletta, Stefano; Pantanowitz, Liron; Malvi, Deborah; Novelli, Luca; Mescoli, Claudia; Cardillo, Massimo; D'Errico, Antonietta; Girolami, Ilaria; Eccher, Albino. - In: ACADEMIC PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 2374-2895. - 9:1(2022), pp. 1-5. [10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047]

Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines

Eccher, Albino
2022

Abstract

Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work.
2022
9
1
1
5
Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines / Marletta, Stefano; Pantanowitz, Liron; Malvi, Deborah; Novelli, Luca; Mescoli, Claudia; Cardillo, Massimo; D'Errico, Antonietta; Girolami, Ilaria; Eccher, Albino. - In: ACADEMIC PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 2374-2895. - 9:1(2022), pp. 1-5. [10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047]
Marletta, Stefano; Pantanowitz, Liron; Malvi, Deborah; Novelli, Luca; Mescoli, Claudia; Cardillo, Massimo; D'Errico, Antonietta; Girolami, Ilaria; Eccher, Albino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2374289522000458-main.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 642.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
642.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1317486
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact