Thanks to cognitive linguistics – as defined by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson – metonymy has also been recognized as a powerful cognitive tool for conceptual contiguity that allows us to conceptualize a certain thing through its relationship with something else. Metonymic concepts form part of the ordinary and everyday way in which we live, structuring not only our language but also our thoughts, attitudes, and actions. This paper highlights how widespread discursive actions within an epidemic/pandemic context manifest themselves in argumentative and rhetorical motifs that can be identified with metonymic processes, which in turn reflect specific cognitive mechanisms and also influence the narrative forms used to describe the experience of contagion and illness affecting oneself, a family member, or on a collective level. In other words, the argumeThanks to cognitive linguistics – as defined by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson – metonymy has also been recognized as a powerful cognitive tool for conceptual contiguity that allows us to conceptualize a certain thing through its relationship with something else. Metonymic concepts form part of the ordinary and everyday way in which we live, structuring not only our language but also our thoughts, attitudes, and actions. This paper highlights how widespread discursive actions within an epidemic/pandemic context manifest themselves in argumentative and rhetorical motifs that can be identified with metonymic processes, which in turn reflect specific cognitive mechanisms and also influence the narrative forms used to describe the experience of contagion and illness affecting oneself, a family member, or on a collective level. In other words, the argumentative logic of contagion (regardless of the semantic discrepancy of the term contagion in antiquity and contemporaneity) seems to have been based on and manifested through contiguous inferential mechanisms over the centuries. ntative logic of contagion (regardless of the semantic discrepancy of the term contagion in antiquity and contemporaneity) seems to have been based on and manifested through contiguous inferential mechanisms over the centuries.

The argumentative and rhetorical function of metonymy in an epidemic/ pandemic context / Conti, Valentina. - 13:(2022), pp. 81-104.

The argumentative and rhetorical function of metonymy in an epidemic/ pandemic context

Valentina Conti
2022

Abstract

Thanks to cognitive linguistics – as defined by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson – metonymy has also been recognized as a powerful cognitive tool for conceptual contiguity that allows us to conceptualize a certain thing through its relationship with something else. Metonymic concepts form part of the ordinary and everyday way in which we live, structuring not only our language but also our thoughts, attitudes, and actions. This paper highlights how widespread discursive actions within an epidemic/pandemic context manifest themselves in argumentative and rhetorical motifs that can be identified with metonymic processes, which in turn reflect specific cognitive mechanisms and also influence the narrative forms used to describe the experience of contagion and illness affecting oneself, a family member, or on a collective level. In other words, the argumeThanks to cognitive linguistics – as defined by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson – metonymy has also been recognized as a powerful cognitive tool for conceptual contiguity that allows us to conceptualize a certain thing through its relationship with something else. Metonymic concepts form part of the ordinary and everyday way in which we live, structuring not only our language but also our thoughts, attitudes, and actions. This paper highlights how widespread discursive actions within an epidemic/pandemic context manifest themselves in argumentative and rhetorical motifs that can be identified with metonymic processes, which in turn reflect specific cognitive mechanisms and also influence the narrative forms used to describe the experience of contagion and illness affecting oneself, a family member, or on a collective level. In other words, the argumentative logic of contagion (regardless of the semantic discrepancy of the term contagion in antiquity and contemporaneity) seems to have been based on and manifested through contiguous inferential mechanisms over the centuries. ntative logic of contagion (regardless of the semantic discrepancy of the term contagion in antiquity and contemporaneity) seems to have been based on and manifested through contiguous inferential mechanisms over the centuries.
2022
Forms and Uses of Argument
Stefano Calabrese e Annamaria Contini
978-3-631-88922-0
Peter Lang
The argumentative and rhetorical function of metonymy in an epidemic/ pandemic context / Conti, Valentina. - 13:(2022), pp. 81-104.
Conti, Valentina
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Calabrese, Contini_Forms and uses of argument.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 557.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
557.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1297205
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact