Following a fundamental statement made in 2016 by the American Statistical Associations and broad and consistent changes in data analysis and interpretation methodology in public health and other sciences, statistical significance/null hypothesis testing is being increasingly criticized and abandoned in the reporting and interpretation of the results of biomedical research. This shift in favor of a more comprehensive and non-dichotomous approach in the assessment of causal relationships may have a major impact on human health risk assessment. It is interesting to see, however, that authoritative opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States and European regulatory agencies have somehow anticipated this tide of criticism of statistical significance testing, thus providing additional support to its demise. Current methodological evidence further warrants abandonment of this approach in both the biomedical and public law contexts, in favor of a more comprehensive and flexible method of assessing exposures of toxicological interest to human and environmental health.

The role of statistical significance testing in public law and health risk assessment / Filippini, Tommaso; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. - In: JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE. - ISSN 1121-2233. - 63:1(2022), pp. E161-E165. [10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2394]

The role of statistical significance testing in public law and health risk assessment

Tommaso Filippini;Silvio Roberto Vinceti
2022

Abstract

Following a fundamental statement made in 2016 by the American Statistical Associations and broad and consistent changes in data analysis and interpretation methodology in public health and other sciences, statistical significance/null hypothesis testing is being increasingly criticized and abandoned in the reporting and interpretation of the results of biomedical research. This shift in favor of a more comprehensive and non-dichotomous approach in the assessment of causal relationships may have a major impact on human health risk assessment. It is interesting to see, however, that authoritative opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States and European regulatory agencies have somehow anticipated this tide of criticism of statistical significance testing, thus providing additional support to its demise. Current methodological evidence further warrants abandonment of this approach in both the biomedical and public law contexts, in favor of a more comprehensive and flexible method of assessing exposures of toxicological interest to human and environmental health.
2022
63
1
E161
E165
The role of statistical significance testing in public law and health risk assessment / Filippini, Tommaso; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. - In: JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE. - ISSN 1121-2233. - 63:1(2022), pp. E161-E165. [10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2394]
Filippini, Tommaso; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2394-Article Text-15225-1-10-20220426.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 100.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
100.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1296345
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact