Recently, the interest of the educational community in laboratory- (lab-) based education has grown steadily. As remote and virtual labs have started to be a reliable alternative to traditional hands-on labs, security and safety issues are becoming increasingly important, especially in the case of remote laboratories, as their interconnected nature raises new and challenging issues. When multiple institutions are involved in a federated labs infrastructure, the complexity increases. Since a structured approach to assess safety and security for federated remote labs is missing, this paper aims at clarifying the general requirements to be considered and proposes a general concept for assessing safety and security in federated labs. Firstly, we analyze the current state on safety and security in remote labs by means of a literature review. Secondly, we investigate existing requirements and define operational requirements for a safety and security guideline in federated remote labs. Thirdly, we provide an overview about standardization approaches and existing guidelines and suggest a guideline, which matches our requirements analysis.

Safety and Security in Federated Remote Labs – A Requirement Analysis / Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M.. - 1231:(2021), pp. 21-36. (17th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2020 usa 2020) [10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_2].

Safety and Security in Federated Remote Labs – A Requirement Analysis

Mezzogori D.;Neroni M.;
2021

Abstract

Recently, the interest of the educational community in laboratory- (lab-) based education has grown steadily. As remote and virtual labs have started to be a reliable alternative to traditional hands-on labs, security and safety issues are becoming increasingly important, especially in the case of remote laboratories, as their interconnected nature raises new and challenging issues. When multiple institutions are involved in a federated labs infrastructure, the complexity increases. Since a structured approach to assess safety and security for federated remote labs is missing, this paper aims at clarifying the general requirements to be considered and proposes a general concept for assessing safety and security in federated labs. Firstly, we analyze the current state on safety and security in remote labs by means of a literature review. Secondly, we investigate existing requirements and define operational requirements for a safety and security guideline in federated remote labs. Thirdly, we provide an overview about standardization approaches and existing guidelines and suggest a guideline, which matches our requirements analysis.
2021
Inglese
17th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2020
usa
2020
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
1231
21
36
9783030525743
Springer
GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
Federated labs; Remote labs; Safety; Security
Uckelmann, D.; Mezzogori, D.; Esposito, G.; Neroni, M.; Reverberi, D.; Ustenko, M.
Atti di CONVEGNO::Relazione in Atti di Convegno
273
6
Safety and Security in Federated Remote Labs – A Requirement Analysis / Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M.. - 1231:(2021), pp. 21-36. (17th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2020 usa 2020) [10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_2].
none
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1294713
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact