A die for Al alloy casting must be designed to achieve the expected quality levels. Moreover, the casting unit cost must be regarded as the objective function to be minimised It can be expressed as a function of the quantity of materials and energy to be used, cycle time and equipment investment. This work compares the performance of the die with inserts manufactured using the usual 1.2343 steel with that of the innovative 1.2383. The latter is considered due to its enhanced thermal conductivity, despite being more expensive. Simulation experiments are designed to evaluate different die layouts. The quality design solutions are evaluated against the cost objective function in order to identify the optimal die choice. A case study on gravity die casting (GDC) of an AlSi7Mg0.3 engine head shows faster solidification dynamics when using 1.2383 instead of 1.2343 steel. This reduces the feeder volume, thus increasing the production yield and speeding up the cycle time with a leverage effect. The higher investment cost for the inserts is rapidly returned thanks to the reduction in variable costs. The Return On Investment (ROI) with the improved die in the new solution is short compared with the life of the die.

A method for yield and cycle time improvements in Al alloy casting with enhanced conductivity steel for die construction / Vergnano, A.; Salvati, E.; Magistrelli, A.; Brambilla, E.; Veronesi, P.; Leali, F.. - In: MANUFACTURING REVIEW. - ISSN 2265-4224. - 9:(2022), pp. 9-18. [10.1051/mfreview/2022017]

A method for yield and cycle time improvements in Al alloy casting with enhanced conductivity steel for die construction

Vergnano A.
Investigation
;
Veronesi P.
Supervision
;
Leali F.
Supervision
2022

Abstract

A die for Al alloy casting must be designed to achieve the expected quality levels. Moreover, the casting unit cost must be regarded as the objective function to be minimised It can be expressed as a function of the quantity of materials and energy to be used, cycle time and equipment investment. This work compares the performance of the die with inserts manufactured using the usual 1.2343 steel with that of the innovative 1.2383. The latter is considered due to its enhanced thermal conductivity, despite being more expensive. Simulation experiments are designed to evaluate different die layouts. The quality design solutions are evaluated against the cost objective function in order to identify the optimal die choice. A case study on gravity die casting (GDC) of an AlSi7Mg0.3 engine head shows faster solidification dynamics when using 1.2383 instead of 1.2343 steel. This reduces the feeder volume, thus increasing the production yield and speeding up the cycle time with a leverage effect. The higher investment cost for the inserts is rapidly returned thanks to the reduction in variable costs. The Return On Investment (ROI) with the improved die in the new solution is short compared with the life of the die.
2022
9
9
18
A method for yield and cycle time improvements in Al alloy casting with enhanced conductivity steel for die construction / Vergnano, A.; Salvati, E.; Magistrelli, A.; Brambilla, E.; Veronesi, P.; Leali, F.. - In: MANUFACTURING REVIEW. - ISSN 2265-4224. - 9:(2022), pp. 9-18. [10.1051/mfreview/2022017]
Vergnano, A.; Salvati, E.; Magistrelli, A.; Brambilla, E.; Veronesi, P.; Leali, F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JOURNAL_ENG_2022_1_Conductivity.pdf

Open access

Descrizione: orignal paper
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1290684
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact