Objectives Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening may increase early detection and reduce complications of AF. European, Australian and World Heart Federation guidelines recommend opportunistic screening, despite a current lack of clear evidence supporting a net benefit for systematic screening. Where screening is implemented, the most appropriate approaches are unknown. We explored the views of European stakeholders about opportunities and challenges of implementing four AF screening scenarios. Design Telephone-based semi-structured interviews with results reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. Data were thematically analysed using the framework approach. Setting AF screening stakeholders in 11 European countries. Participants Healthcare professionals and regulators (n=24) potentially involved in AF screening implementation. Intervention Four AF screening scenarios: single time point opportunistic, opportunistic prolonged, systematic single time point/prolonged and patient-led screening. Primary outcome measures Stakeholder views about the challenges and feasibility of implementing the screening scenarios in the respective national/regional healthcare system. Results Three themes developed. (1) Current screening approaches: there are no national AF screening programmes, with most AF detected in symptomatic patients. Patient-led screening exists via personal devices, creating screening inequity. (2) Feasibility of screening: single time point opportunistic screening in primary care using single-lead ECG devices was considered the most feasible. Software algorithms may aid identification of suitable patients and telehealth services have potential to support diagnosis. (3) Implementation requirements: sufficient evidence of benefit is required. National screening processes are required due to different payment mechanisms and health service regulations. Concerns about data security, and inclusivity for those without primary care access or personal devices must be addressed. Conclusions There is an overall awareness of AF screening. Opportunistic screening appears the most feasible across Europe. Challenges are health inequalities, identification of best target groups for screening, streamlined processes, the need for evidence of benefit and a tailored approach adapted to national realities.

Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries / Engler, Daniel; L Hanson, Coral; Desteghe, Lien; Boriani, Giuseppe; Zöga Diederichsen, Søren; Freedman, Ben; Palà, Elena; S Potpara, Tatjana; Witt, Henning; Heidbuchel, Hein; Neubeck, Lis; B Schnabel, Renate. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 12:6(2022), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059156]

Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries

Giuseppe Boriani;
2022

Abstract

Objectives Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening may increase early detection and reduce complications of AF. European, Australian and World Heart Federation guidelines recommend opportunistic screening, despite a current lack of clear evidence supporting a net benefit for systematic screening. Where screening is implemented, the most appropriate approaches are unknown. We explored the views of European stakeholders about opportunities and challenges of implementing four AF screening scenarios. Design Telephone-based semi-structured interviews with results reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. Data were thematically analysed using the framework approach. Setting AF screening stakeholders in 11 European countries. Participants Healthcare professionals and regulators (n=24) potentially involved in AF screening implementation. Intervention Four AF screening scenarios: single time point opportunistic, opportunistic prolonged, systematic single time point/prolonged and patient-led screening. Primary outcome measures Stakeholder views about the challenges and feasibility of implementing the screening scenarios in the respective national/regional healthcare system. Results Three themes developed. (1) Current screening approaches: there are no national AF screening programmes, with most AF detected in symptomatic patients. Patient-led screening exists via personal devices, creating screening inequity. (2) Feasibility of screening: single time point opportunistic screening in primary care using single-lead ECG devices was considered the most feasible. Software algorithms may aid identification of suitable patients and telehealth services have potential to support diagnosis. (3) Implementation requirements: sufficient evidence of benefit is required. National screening processes are required due to different payment mechanisms and health service regulations. Concerns about data security, and inclusivity for those without primary care access or personal devices must be addressed. Conclusions There is an overall awareness of AF screening. Opportunistic screening appears the most feasible across Europe. Challenges are health inequalities, identification of best target groups for screening, streamlined processes, the need for evidence of benefit and a tailored approach adapted to national realities.
12
6
N/A
N/A
Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries / Engler, Daniel; L Hanson, Coral; Desteghe, Lien; Boriani, Giuseppe; Zöga Diederichsen, Søren; Freedman, Ben; Palà, Elena; S Potpara, Tatjana; Witt, Henning; Heidbuchel, Hein; Neubeck, Lis; B Schnabel, Renate. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 12:6(2022), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059156]
Engler, Daniel; L Hanson, Coral; Desteghe, Lien; Boriani, Giuseppe; Zöga Diederichsen, Søren; Freedman, Ben; Palà, Elena; S Potpara, Tatjana; Witt, Henning; Heidbuchel, Hein; Neubeck, Lis; B Schnabel, Renate
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
e059156.full.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1287530
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact