The Tower of Pisa survived several strong earthquakes undamaged over the last 650 years, despite its leaning and limited strength and ductility. No credible explanation for its remarkable seismic performance exists to date. A reassessment of this unique case history in light of new seismological, geological, structural, and geotechnical information is reported, aiming to address this question. The following topics are discussed: (1) dynamic structural identification based on recorded earthquake data; (2) geophysical site characterization using a two-dimensional array; (3) seismic hazard and site response analysis considering horizontal and vertical motions; and (4) soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis calibrated using lab and field data. A substantial shift in natural period, from about 0.35 s to over 1 s (a threefold increase, the largest known for a building of that height) caused by SSI, a wave parameter (1∕σ) of about 0.3, and a minor effect of vertical ground motion are identified and may explain the lack of earthquake damage on the Tower. Recommendations for future research, including the need to establish a seismic bedrock deeper than 500 m, are provided.

Seismic reassessment of the leaning tower of Pisa: Dynamic monitoring, site response, and SSI / Fiorentino, G.; Quaranta, G.; Mylonakis, G.; Lavorato, D.; Pagliaroli, A.; Carlucci, G.; Sabetta, F.; Monica, G. D.; Lanzo, G.; Aprile, V.; Marano, G. C.; Briseghella, B.; Monti, G.; Squeglia, N.; Bartelletti, R.; Nuti, C.. - In: EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA. - ISSN 8755-2930. - 35:2(2019), pp. 703-736. [10.1193/021518EQS037M]

Seismic reassessment of the leaning tower of Pisa: Dynamic monitoring, site response, and SSI

Fiorentino G.;Briseghella B.;
2019

Abstract

The Tower of Pisa survived several strong earthquakes undamaged over the last 650 years, despite its leaning and limited strength and ductility. No credible explanation for its remarkable seismic performance exists to date. A reassessment of this unique case history in light of new seismological, geological, structural, and geotechnical information is reported, aiming to address this question. The following topics are discussed: (1) dynamic structural identification based on recorded earthquake data; (2) geophysical site characterization using a two-dimensional array; (3) seismic hazard and site response analysis considering horizontal and vertical motions; and (4) soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis calibrated using lab and field data. A substantial shift in natural period, from about 0.35 s to over 1 s (a threefold increase, the largest known for a building of that height) caused by SSI, a wave parameter (1∕σ) of about 0.3, and a minor effect of vertical ground motion are identified and may explain the lack of earthquake damage on the Tower. Recommendations for future research, including the need to establish a seismic bedrock deeper than 500 m, are provided.
2019
35
2
703
736
Seismic reassessment of the leaning tower of Pisa: Dynamic monitoring, site response, and SSI / Fiorentino, G.; Quaranta, G.; Mylonakis, G.; Lavorato, D.; Pagliaroli, A.; Carlucci, G.; Sabetta, F.; Monica, G. D.; Lanzo, G.; Aprile, V.; Marano, G. C.; Briseghella, B.; Monti, G.; Squeglia, N.; Bartelletti, R.; Nuti, C.. - In: EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA. - ISSN 8755-2930. - 35:2(2019), pp. 703-736. [10.1193/021518EQS037M]
Fiorentino, G.; Quaranta, G.; Mylonakis, G.; Lavorato, D.; Pagliaroli, A.; Carlucci, G.; Sabetta, F.; Monica, G. D.; Lanzo, G.; Aprile, V.; Marano, G....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1287320
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact