Letter to reply to: Daniel R. Curtis et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01862-4 (2022)) that raise concerns about the interpretation of the results of the analysis of pollen data from 261 sites from 19 modern-day European countries presented in the paper by Izdebski et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01652-4).
Reply to ‘Reduction in grain pollen indicates population decline, but not necessarily Black Death mortality’ / Izdebski, A.; Bauch, M.; Guzowski, P.; Mensing, S.; Mercuri, A. M.; Newfield, T.; Piovesan, G.; Sadori, L.; Vignola, C.; Masi, A.. - In: NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION. - ISSN 2397-334X. - 6:11(2022), pp. 1628-1629. [10.1038/s41559-022-01863-3]
Reply to ‘Reduction in grain pollen indicates population decline, but not necessarily Black Death mortality’
A. M. Mercuri;L. Sadori;
2022
Abstract
Letter to reply to: Daniel R. Curtis et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01862-4 (2022)) that raise concerns about the interpretation of the results of the analysis of pollen data from 261 sites from 19 modern-day European countries presented in the paper by Izdebski et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01652-4).
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris
