OBJECTIVE: In diagnostic accuracy studies, the reference standard may be imperfect or not available in all patients. We systematically reviewed the proposed solutions for these situations and generated methodological guidance. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of methodological articles. RESULTS: We categorized the solutions into four main groups. The first group includes methods that impute or adjust for missing data on the reference standard. The second group consists of methods that correct estimates of accuracy obtained with an imperfect reference standard. In the third group a reference standard is constructed by combining multiple test results through a predefined rule, based on a consensus procedure, or through statistical modeling. In the fourth group, the diagnostic accuracy paradigm is abandoned in favor of validation studies that relate index test results to relevant clinical data, such as history, future clinical events, and response to therapy. CONCLUSION: Most of the methods try to impute, adjust, or construct a reference standard. In situations that deviate only marginally from the classical diagnostic accuracy paradigm, these are valuable methods. In cases where an acceptable reference standard does not exist, the concept of clinical test validation may provide an alternative paradigm to evaluate a diagnostic test.

A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard / Reitsma, Jb; Rutjes, A; Khan, Ks; Coomarasamy, A; Bossuyt, Pm. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - 62:8(2009), pp. 797-806. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.005]

A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard

Rutjes A;
2009

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In diagnostic accuracy studies, the reference standard may be imperfect or not available in all patients. We systematically reviewed the proposed solutions for these situations and generated methodological guidance. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of methodological articles. RESULTS: We categorized the solutions into four main groups. The first group includes methods that impute or adjust for missing data on the reference standard. The second group consists of methods that correct estimates of accuracy obtained with an imperfect reference standard. In the third group a reference standard is constructed by combining multiple test results through a predefined rule, based on a consensus procedure, or through statistical modeling. In the fourth group, the diagnostic accuracy paradigm is abandoned in favor of validation studies that relate index test results to relevant clinical data, such as history, future clinical events, and response to therapy. CONCLUSION: Most of the methods try to impute, adjust, or construct a reference standard. In situations that deviate only marginally from the classical diagnostic accuracy paradigm, these are valuable methods. In cases where an acceptable reference standard does not exist, the concept of clinical test validation may provide an alternative paradigm to evaluate a diagnostic test.
62
8
797
806
A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard / Reitsma, Jb; Rutjes, A; Khan, Ks; Coomarasamy, A; Bossuyt, Pm. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0895-4356. - 62:8(2009), pp. 797-806. [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.005]
Reitsma, Jb; Rutjes, A; Khan, Ks; Coomarasamy, A; Bossuyt, Pm
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2009_Reitsma_Rutjes_JClinEpi.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Author's pesonal copy
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 175.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1286613
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 264
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 255
social impact