Background: Presently, according to different difficulty scoring systems, there is no difference in complexity estimation of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segments 7 and 8. However, there is no published data supporting this assumption. To date, no studies have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of the liver segments 7 and 8. Methods: A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing LLR of segments 7 and 8 in 46 centers between 2004 and 2020 was performed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare isolated LLR of segments 7 and 8. Subset analyses were also performed to compare atypical resections and segmentectomies of 7 and 8. Results: A total of 2411 patients were identified, and 1691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Comparison after PSM between the entire cohort of segment 7 and segment 8 resections revealed inferior results for segment 7 resection in terms of increased blood loss, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Subset analyses of only atypical resections similarly demonstrated poorer outcomes for segment 7 in terms of increased blood loss, operation time, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Conversely, a subgroup analysis of segmentectomies after PSM found better outcomes for segment 7 in terms of a shorter operation time and hospital stay. Conclusion: Differences in the outcomes of segments 7 and 8 resections suggest a greater difficulty of laparoscopic atypical resection of segment 7 compared to segment 8, and greater difficulty of segmentectomy 8 compared to segmentectomy 7.

Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study / Efanov, M.; Salimgereeva, D.; Alikhanov, R.; Wu, A. G. R.; Geller, D.; Cipriani, F.; Aghayan, D. L.; Fretland, A. A.; Sijberden, J.; Belli, A.; Marino, M. V.; Mazzaferro, V.; Chiow, A. K. H.; Sucandy, I.; Ivanecz, A.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J. H.; Prieto, M.; Vivarelli, M.; Giuliante, F.; Ruzzenente, A.; Yong, C. -C.; Fondevila, C.; Rotellar, F.; Choi, G. -H.; Robless Campos, R.; Wang, X.; Sutcliffe, R. P.; Pratschke, J.; Lai, E.; Chong, C. C.; D'Hondt, M.; Monden, K.; Lopez-Ben, S.; Herman, P.; Di Benedetto, F.; Kingham, T. P.; Liu, R.; Long, T. C. D.; Ferrero, A.; Levi Sandri, G. B.; Cherqui, D.; Scatton, O.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Cheung, T. -T.; Sugioka, A.; Han, H. -S.; Abu Hilal, M.; Soubrane, O.; Fuks, D.; Aldrighetti, L.; Edwin, B.; Goh, B. K. P.; Chan, C. -Y.; Syn, N.; D'Silva, M.; Lee, B.; Lim, C.; Nghia, P. P.; Gastaca, M.; Schotte, H.; De Meyere, C.; Krenzien, F.; Schmelzle, M.; Lee, K. -F.; Lee, L. S.; Jang, J. Y.; Kojima, M.; Kato, Y.; Ghotbi, J.; Kruger, J. A. P.; Coelho, F. F.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Valle, B. D.; Robert, M. C. I.; Mishima, K.; Montalti, R.; Giglio, M.; Wang, H. -P.; Pascual, F.; Saleh, M.; Kadam, P.; Tang, C. -N.; Ardito, F.; Vani, S.; Giustizieri, U.; Citterio, D.; Mocchegiani, F.; Ettorre, G. M.; Colasanti, M.; Guzman, Y.; Dogeas, E.; Magistri, P.; Mazzotta, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES. - ISSN 1868-6974. - (2022), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1002/jhbp.1210]

Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study

Di Benedetto F.;Magistri P.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background: Presently, according to different difficulty scoring systems, there is no difference in complexity estimation of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segments 7 and 8. However, there is no published data supporting this assumption. To date, no studies have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of the liver segments 7 and 8. Methods: A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing LLR of segments 7 and 8 in 46 centers between 2004 and 2020 was performed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare isolated LLR of segments 7 and 8. Subset analyses were also performed to compare atypical resections and segmentectomies of 7 and 8. Results: A total of 2411 patients were identified, and 1691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Comparison after PSM between the entire cohort of segment 7 and segment 8 resections revealed inferior results for segment 7 resection in terms of increased blood loss, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Subset analyses of only atypical resections similarly demonstrated poorer outcomes for segment 7 in terms of increased blood loss, operation time, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Conversely, a subgroup analysis of segmentectomies after PSM found better outcomes for segment 7 in terms of a shorter operation time and hospital stay. Conclusion: Differences in the outcomes of segments 7 and 8 resections suggest a greater difficulty of laparoscopic atypical resection of segment 7 compared to segment 8, and greater difficulty of segmentectomy 8 compared to segmentectomy 7.
N/A
N/A
Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study / Efanov, M.; Salimgereeva, D.; Alikhanov, R.; Wu, A. G. R.; Geller, D.; Cipriani, F.; Aghayan, D. L.; Fretland, A. A.; Sijberden, J.; Belli, A.; Marino, M. V.; Mazzaferro, V.; Chiow, A. K. H.; Sucandy, I.; Ivanecz, A.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J. H.; Prieto, M.; Vivarelli, M.; Giuliante, F.; Ruzzenente, A.; Yong, C. -C.; Fondevila, C.; Rotellar, F.; Choi, G. -H.; Robless Campos, R.; Wang, X.; Sutcliffe, R. P.; Pratschke, J.; Lai, E.; Chong, C. C.; D'Hondt, M.; Monden, K.; Lopez-Ben, S.; Herman, P.; Di Benedetto, F.; Kingham, T. P.; Liu, R.; Long, T. C. D.; Ferrero, A.; Levi Sandri, G. B.; Cherqui, D.; Scatton, O.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Cheung, T. -T.; Sugioka, A.; Han, H. -S.; Abu Hilal, M.; Soubrane, O.; Fuks, D.; Aldrighetti, L.; Edwin, B.; Goh, B. K. P.; Chan, C. -Y.; Syn, N.; D'Silva, M.; Lee, B.; Lim, C.; Nghia, P. P.; Gastaca, M.; Schotte, H.; De Meyere, C.; Krenzien, F.; Schmelzle, M.; Lee, K. -F.; Lee, L. S.; Jang, J. Y.; Kojima, M.; Kato, Y.; Ghotbi, J.; Kruger, J. A. P.; Coelho, F. F.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Valle, B. D.; Robert, M. C. I.; Mishima, K.; Montalti, R.; Giglio, M.; Wang, H. -P.; Pascual, F.; Saleh, M.; Kadam, P.; Tang, C. -N.; Ardito, F.; Vani, S.; Giustizieri, U.; Citterio, D.; Mocchegiani, F.; Ettorre, G. M.; Colasanti, M.; Guzman, Y.; Dogeas, E.; Magistri, P.; Mazzotta, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES. - ISSN 1868-6974. - (2022), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1002/jhbp.1210]
Efanov, M.; Salimgereeva, D.; Alikhanov, R.; Wu, A. G. R.; Geller, D.; Cipriani, F.; Aghayan, D. L.; Fretland, A. A.; Sijberden, J.; Belli, A.; Marino, M. V.; Mazzaferro, V.; Chiow, A. K. H.; Sucandy, I.; Ivanecz, A.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J. H.; Prieto, M.; Vivarelli, M.; Giuliante, F.; Ruzzenente, A.; Yong, C. -C.; Fondevila, C.; Rotellar, F.; Choi, G. -H.; Robless Campos, R.; Wang, X.; Sutcliffe, R. P.; Pratschke, J.; Lai, E.; Chong, C. C.; D'Hondt, M.; Monden, K.; Lopez-Ben, S.; Herman, P.; Di Benedetto, F.; Kingham, T. P.; Liu, R.; Long, T. C. D.; Ferrero, A.; Levi Sandri, G. B.; Cherqui, D.; Scatton, O.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Cheung, T. -T.; Sugioka, A.; Han, H. -S.; Abu Hilal, M.; Soubrane, O.; Fuks, D.; Aldrighetti, L.; Edwin, B.; Goh, B. K. P.; Chan, C. -Y.; Syn, N.; D'Silva, M.; Lee, B.; Lim, C.; Nghia, P. P.; Gastaca, M.; Schotte, H.; De Meyere, C.; Krenzien, F.; Schmelzle, M.; Lee, K. -F.; Lee, L. S.; Jang, J. Y.; Kojima, M.; Kato, Y.; Ghotbi, J.; Kruger, J. A. P.; Coelho, F. F.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Valle, B. D.; Robert, M. C. I.; Mishima, K.; Montalti, R.; Giglio, M.; Wang, H. -P.; Pascual, F.; Saleh, M.; Kadam, P.; Tang, C. -N.; Ardito, F.; Vani, S.; Giustizieri, U.; Citterio, D.; Mocchegiani, F.; Ettorre, G. M.; Colasanti, M.; Guzman, Y.; Dogeas, E.; Magistri, P.; Mazzotta, A.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1286474
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact