Objective: Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing elective fenestrated branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) is not standardised, nor are there any recommendations from current guidelines. By designing an international expert based Delphi consensus, the study aimed to create recommendations on the pre-, intra-, and post-operative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients scheduled for elective F-BEVAR in high volume centres. Methods: Eight facilitators created appropriate statements regarding the study topic that were voted on, using a four point Likert scale, by a selected panel of international experts using a three round modified Delphi consensus process. Based on the experts’ responses, only those statements reaching Grade A (full agreement ≥ 75%) or B (overall agreement ≥ 80% and full disagreement < 5%) were included in the final document. The round answers’ consistency was graded using Cohen's k, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and, in case of double re-submission, the Fleiss k. Results: Sixty-seven experts were included in the final analysis and voted the initial 43 statements related to pre- (n = 15), intra- (n = 10), and post-operative (n = 18) management of antithrombotic drugs. At the end of the process, six statements (13%) were rejected, 20 statements (44%) received a Grade B consensus, and 18 statements (40%) reached a Grade A consensus. Most statements (27; 71%) exhibited very high or high consistency grades, and 11 (29%) a fair or poor grading. The intra-operative statements mostly concentrated on threshold for and monitoring of proper heparinisation. The pre- and post-operative statements mainly focused on indications for dual antiplatelet therapy and its management, considering the possible need for cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Conclusion: Based on the elevated strength and high consistency of this international expert based Delphi consensus, most of the statements might guide current clinical management of antithrombotic therapy for elective F-BEVAR. Future studies are needed to clarify the debated issues.

Editor's Choice – PRINciples of optimal antithrombotiC therapy and coagulation managEment during elective fenestrated and branched EndovaScular aortic repairS (PRINCE2SS): An International Expert Based Delphi Consensus Study / D'Oria, M.; Bertoglio, L.; Bignamini, A. A.; Mani, K.; Kolbel, T.; Oderich, G.; Chiesa, R.; Lepidi, S.; Abisi, S.; Adam, D.; Antonello, M.; Austermann, M.; Beck, A. W.; Berard, X.; Bisdas, T.; Bockler, D.; Budtz-Lilly, J.; Cheng, S. W. K.; Czerny, M.; Demartino, R.; Dias, N.; Donas, K. P.; Eagleton, M. J.; Farber, M. A.; Fargion, A. T.; Ferreira, M.; Forbes, T. L.; Gargiulo, M.; Gasper, W. J.; Jakimowicz, T.; Haulon, S.; Hockley, J. A.; Holden, A.; Holt, P.; Kahlberg, A.; Khashram, M.; Kotelis, D.; Lundberg, G.; Maldonado, T. S.; Mangialardi, N.; Mastracci, T. M.; Maurel, B.; Milner, R.; Modarai, B.; Pannuccio, G.; Parlani, G.; Pratesi, G.; Pulli, R.; Qasabian, R. A.; Reijnen, M. M. P. J.; Resh, T.; Riambau, V.; Settembre, N.; Schanzer, A.; Schmidt, A.; Schneider, D.; Schurink, G. W. H.; Silingardi, R.; Sobocinski, J.; Soler, R.; Sweet, M. P.; Leong Tan, G. W.; Tenorio, E. R.; Tielliu, I. F. J.; Timaran, C. H.; Tshomba, Y.; Tsilimparis, N.; Van den Eynde, W.; Vasudevan, T.; Veraldi, G. F.; Verhagen, H. J.; Verhoeven, E.; Verzini, F.; Wanhainen, A.; Zimmermann, A.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1078-5884. - 63:6(2022), pp. 838-850. [10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.002]

Editor's Choice – PRINciples of optimal antithrombotiC therapy and coagulation managEment during elective fenestrated and branched EndovaScular aortic repairS (PRINCE2SS): An International Expert Based Delphi Consensus Study

Chiesa R.;Silingardi R.;
2022

Abstract

Objective: Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing elective fenestrated branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) is not standardised, nor are there any recommendations from current guidelines. By designing an international expert based Delphi consensus, the study aimed to create recommendations on the pre-, intra-, and post-operative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients scheduled for elective F-BEVAR in high volume centres. Methods: Eight facilitators created appropriate statements regarding the study topic that were voted on, using a four point Likert scale, by a selected panel of international experts using a three round modified Delphi consensus process. Based on the experts’ responses, only those statements reaching Grade A (full agreement ≥ 75%) or B (overall agreement ≥ 80% and full disagreement < 5%) were included in the final document. The round answers’ consistency was graded using Cohen's k, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and, in case of double re-submission, the Fleiss k. Results: Sixty-seven experts were included in the final analysis and voted the initial 43 statements related to pre- (n = 15), intra- (n = 10), and post-operative (n = 18) management of antithrombotic drugs. At the end of the process, six statements (13%) were rejected, 20 statements (44%) received a Grade B consensus, and 18 statements (40%) reached a Grade A consensus. Most statements (27; 71%) exhibited very high or high consistency grades, and 11 (29%) a fair or poor grading. The intra-operative statements mostly concentrated on threshold for and monitoring of proper heparinisation. The pre- and post-operative statements mainly focused on indications for dual antiplatelet therapy and its management, considering the possible need for cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Conclusion: Based on the elevated strength and high consistency of this international expert based Delphi consensus, most of the statements might guide current clinical management of antithrombotic therapy for elective F-BEVAR. Future studies are needed to clarify the debated issues.
2022
63
6
838
850
Editor's Choice – PRINciples of optimal antithrombotiC therapy and coagulation managEment during elective fenestrated and branched EndovaScular aortic repairS (PRINCE2SS): An International Expert Based Delphi Consensus Study / D'Oria, M.; Bertoglio, L.; Bignamini, A. A.; Mani, K.; Kolbel, T.; Oderich, G.; Chiesa, R.; Lepidi, S.; Abisi, S.; Adam, D.; Antonello, M.; Austermann, M.; Beck, A. W.; Berard, X.; Bisdas, T.; Bockler, D.; Budtz-Lilly, J.; Cheng, S. W. K.; Czerny, M.; Demartino, R.; Dias, N.; Donas, K. P.; Eagleton, M. J.; Farber, M. A.; Fargion, A. T.; Ferreira, M.; Forbes, T. L.; Gargiulo, M.; Gasper, W. J.; Jakimowicz, T.; Haulon, S.; Hockley, J. A.; Holden, A.; Holt, P.; Kahlberg, A.; Khashram, M.; Kotelis, D.; Lundberg, G.; Maldonado, T. S.; Mangialardi, N.; Mastracci, T. M.; Maurel, B.; Milner, R.; Modarai, B.; Pannuccio, G.; Parlani, G.; Pratesi, G.; Pulli, R.; Qasabian, R. A.; Reijnen, M. M. P. J.; Resh, T.; Riambau, V.; Settembre, N.; Schanzer, A.; Schmidt, A.; Schneider, D.; Schurink, G. W. H.; Silingardi, R.; Sobocinski, J.; Soler, R.; Sweet, M. P.; Leong Tan, G. W.; Tenorio, E. R.; Tielliu, I. F. J.; Timaran, C. H.; Tshomba, Y.; Tsilimparis, N.; Van den Eynde, W.; Vasudevan, T.; Veraldi, G. F.; Verhagen, H. J.; Verhoeven, E.; Verzini, F.; Wanhainen, A.; Zimmermann, A.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1078-5884. - 63:6(2022), pp. 838-850. [10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.002]
D'Oria, M.; Bertoglio, L.; Bignamini, A. A.; Mani, K.; Kolbel, T.; Oderich, G.; Chiesa, R.; Lepidi, S.; Abisi, S.; Adam, D.; Antonello, M.; Austermann...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS1078588422001435.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.07 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1285786
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact