Purpose: To compare reusable and disposable flexible ureteroscopes in terms of efficacy and safety for patients undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS). Patients and Methods: Patients with a renal stone eligible for RIRS were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, clinical trial study. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (90 patients) underwent RIRS with a reusable flexible ureteroscope and group B (90 patients) were treated with a disposable one. Results: The patients’ demographics, stone features and pre-operative urine cultures were comparable between the groups. The Stone Free Rates (SFRs) were not significantly different (86.6% and 90.0% for group A and group B, respectively, p=0.11) and the mean cost for each procedure was comparable (2321 € in group A vs 2543 € in group B, p=0.09). However, the days of hospitalization and of antibiotic therapy were higher in group A (p ≤ 0.05). The overall complication rate in group A was 8.8% whilst in group B it was 3.3% (p ≤ 0.05); in particular, group A exhibited a greater number of major complications (Clavien score IIIa-V). The overall postoperative infection rate was 16.6% in group A and 3.3% in group B (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, none of the patients in group B developed urosepsis or had a positive blood culture, while 3 patients in group A did (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of disposable ureteroscopes is characterized by significantly lower post-operative complications and infection rates, while having comparable costs and SFRs vis à vis reusable ureteroscopes. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN92289221.

Disposable versus reusable ureteroscopes: A prospective multicenter randomized comparison / Bozzini, G.; Filippi, B.; Alriyalat, S.; Calori, A.; Besana, U.; Mueller, A.; Pushkar, D.; Romero-Otero, J.; Pastore, A.; Sighinolfi, M. C.; Micali, S.; Buizza, C.; Rocco, B.. - In: RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY. - ISSN 2253-2447. - 13:(2021), pp. 63-71. [10.2147/RRU.S277049]

Disposable versus reusable ureteroscopes: A prospective multicenter randomized comparison

Bozzini G.;Filippi B.;Sighinolfi M. C.;Micali S.;Rocco B.
2021

Abstract

Purpose: To compare reusable and disposable flexible ureteroscopes in terms of efficacy and safety for patients undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS). Patients and Methods: Patients with a renal stone eligible for RIRS were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, clinical trial study. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (90 patients) underwent RIRS with a reusable flexible ureteroscope and group B (90 patients) were treated with a disposable one. Results: The patients’ demographics, stone features and pre-operative urine cultures were comparable between the groups. The Stone Free Rates (SFRs) were not significantly different (86.6% and 90.0% for group A and group B, respectively, p=0.11) and the mean cost for each procedure was comparable (2321 € in group A vs 2543 € in group B, p=0.09). However, the days of hospitalization and of antibiotic therapy were higher in group A (p ≤ 0.05). The overall complication rate in group A was 8.8% whilst in group B it was 3.3% (p ≤ 0.05); in particular, group A exhibited a greater number of major complications (Clavien score IIIa-V). The overall postoperative infection rate was 16.6% in group A and 3.3% in group B (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, none of the patients in group B developed urosepsis or had a positive blood culture, while 3 patients in group A did (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of disposable ureteroscopes is characterized by significantly lower post-operative complications and infection rates, while having comparable costs and SFRs vis à vis reusable ureteroscopes. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN92289221.
13
63
71
Disposable versus reusable ureteroscopes: A prospective multicenter randomized comparison / Bozzini, G.; Filippi, B.; Alriyalat, S.; Calori, A.; Besana, U.; Mueller, A.; Pushkar, D.; Romero-Otero, J.; Pastore, A.; Sighinolfi, M. C.; Micali, S.; Buizza, C.; Rocco, B.. - In: RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY. - ISSN 2253-2447. - 13:(2021), pp. 63-71. [10.2147/RRU.S277049]
Bozzini, G.; Filippi, B.; Alriyalat, S.; Calori, A.; Besana, U.; Mueller, A.; Pushkar, D.; Romero-Otero, J.; Pastore, A.; Sighinolfi, M. C.; Micali, S.; Buizza, C.; Rocco, B.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rru-277049-disposable-versus-reusable-ureteroscopes-a-prospective-mult.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 1.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1281585
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact