Purpose: Under thin, partial coverage restoration the proper cement thickness to be clinically employed still remains an issue. The aim of this study was to determine the failure and success rates of simplified lithium disilicate occlusal veneers as a function of cement thickness. The null hypothesis was that cement thickness has no effect on the fatigue resistance. Methods: Sound human molars were severed in a plane parallel to the occlusal surface to create a flat dentin surface surrounded by enamel edges. Forty-five occlusal veneers 1.0 mm thick (IPS e.max CAD LT) were luted to the teeth with Multilink Automix resin cement, creating 3 experimental groups (n=15) with cement thicknesses of 50, 100, and 200 µm. The restorations were fatigue-cycled using a ball mill machine containing zirconia and stainless steel spheres. Twelve 60 min cycles were performed. Survival statistics were applied to “failure” and “success” events, comparing the three groups using a log-rank Mantel– Cox test and a log-rank test for trends (alpha = 0.05). Results: The failure and success rates were not significantly influenced by cement thickness (P = 0.137 and P = 0.872, respectively); thus, the null hypothesis was accepted. However, when log-rank test for trends was applied to failure events, the tendency to have less failures with increasing thicknesses was found statistically significant (P = 0.047). Conclusions: The cement thickness within the range adopted here did not have a significant effect on the failure or success rate of lithium disilicate occlusal veneers when exposed to randomized impact stresses generating fatigue phenomena.

Fatigue failure and success rate of lithium disilicate table-tops as a function of cement thickness / Baldissara, P.; Koci, B.; Monaco, C.; Scotti, N.; Breschi, L.; Ciocca, L.. - In: JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH. - ISSN 1883-1958. - 65:4(2021), pp. 528-534. [10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00220]

Fatigue failure and success rate of lithium disilicate table-tops as a function of cement thickness

Monaco C.;
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Under thin, partial coverage restoration the proper cement thickness to be clinically employed still remains an issue. The aim of this study was to determine the failure and success rates of simplified lithium disilicate occlusal veneers as a function of cement thickness. The null hypothesis was that cement thickness has no effect on the fatigue resistance. Methods: Sound human molars were severed in a plane parallel to the occlusal surface to create a flat dentin surface surrounded by enamel edges. Forty-five occlusal veneers 1.0 mm thick (IPS e.max CAD LT) were luted to the teeth with Multilink Automix resin cement, creating 3 experimental groups (n=15) with cement thicknesses of 50, 100, and 200 µm. The restorations were fatigue-cycled using a ball mill machine containing zirconia and stainless steel spheres. Twelve 60 min cycles were performed. Survival statistics were applied to “failure” and “success” events, comparing the three groups using a log-rank Mantel– Cox test and a log-rank test for trends (alpha = 0.05). Results: The failure and success rates were not significantly influenced by cement thickness (P = 0.137 and P = 0.872, respectively); thus, the null hypothesis was accepted. However, when log-rank test for trends was applied to failure events, the tendency to have less failures with increasing thicknesses was found statistically significant (P = 0.047). Conclusions: The cement thickness within the range adopted here did not have a significant effect on the failure or success rate of lithium disilicate occlusal veneers when exposed to randomized impact stresses generating fatigue phenomena.
2021
65
4
528
534
Fatigue failure and success rate of lithium disilicate table-tops as a function of cement thickness / Baldissara, P.; Koci, B.; Monaco, C.; Scotti, N.; Breschi, L.; Ciocca, L.. - In: JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH. - ISSN 1883-1958. - 65:4(2021), pp. 528-534. [10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00220]
Baldissara, P.; Koci, B.; Monaco, C.; Scotti, N.; Breschi, L.; Ciocca, L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
65_JPR_D_20_00220.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1281226
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact