Purpose: Palliative sedation (PS) plays a critical role to give suffering relief from refractory symptoms at the end of life. Our audit aimed to assess and improve quality of PS at the Department of Oncology and Hematology of University Hospital of Modena, to verify the adherence to international guidelines, the cooperation among members of care team, focusing with attention on family’s perception of this delicate situation. Methods: From December 2016 to June 2019, data of patients undergoing PS in the Department were collected by an electronic folder tool, “Sedation Tool” (ST), that recorded clinical and PS informations, D-PaP, Rudkin score, and family’s perception. Results: In total, 245 patients were enrolled. Eighty-two percent had a Karnofsky Performance Status 10–20%. The most common cancer types were lung and gastro-intestinal carcinomas (27% and 21% respectively). Refractory symptoms observed were confusion and agitation (76%), dyspnea (39%), pain (15%), delirium (10%), and psychological distress (5%). Midazolam was the drug of choice for PS. Most of patients had Rudkin score 5 after 24 h and 33% had terminal event within a period of 24 h from the beginning of PS. During PS, most of patient’s relatives reported peacefulness (65%), agitation/impatience in 6% of cases, and concern for suffering (16%). Conclusion: PS is used in case of worsening general conditions at the end-stage disease to relieve refractory symptoms with dignity. The ST can become a simple instrument to evaluate and improve PS quality, providing more attention on the impact of PS on relatives to then possibly develop new supportive procedures for patients and their families.

The quality of palliative sedation in end-stage disease: audit from a department of oncology and haematology / Alessia, S.; Matilde, S. F.; Chrystel, I.; Massimiliano, S.; Daniele, D.; Claudia, F.; Raffaella, P.; Flavia, C.; Leonardo, F.; Chiara, C.; Leonardo, P.; Dominici, Massimo; Luppi, Mario; Giuseppe, L.. - In: SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER. - ISSN 0941-4355. - 30:5(2022), pp. 3849-3855. [10.1007/s00520-021-06730-8]

The quality of palliative sedation in end-stage disease: audit from a department of oncology and haematology

Massimo Dominici.;Mario L.;
2022

Abstract

Purpose: Palliative sedation (PS) plays a critical role to give suffering relief from refractory symptoms at the end of life. Our audit aimed to assess and improve quality of PS at the Department of Oncology and Hematology of University Hospital of Modena, to verify the adherence to international guidelines, the cooperation among members of care team, focusing with attention on family’s perception of this delicate situation. Methods: From December 2016 to June 2019, data of patients undergoing PS in the Department were collected by an electronic folder tool, “Sedation Tool” (ST), that recorded clinical and PS informations, D-PaP, Rudkin score, and family’s perception. Results: In total, 245 patients were enrolled. Eighty-two percent had a Karnofsky Performance Status 10–20%. The most common cancer types were lung and gastro-intestinal carcinomas (27% and 21% respectively). Refractory symptoms observed were confusion and agitation (76%), dyspnea (39%), pain (15%), delirium (10%), and psychological distress (5%). Midazolam was the drug of choice for PS. Most of patients had Rudkin score 5 after 24 h and 33% had terminal event within a period of 24 h from the beginning of PS. During PS, most of patient’s relatives reported peacefulness (65%), agitation/impatience in 6% of cases, and concern for suffering (16%). Conclusion: PS is used in case of worsening general conditions at the end-stage disease to relieve refractory symptoms with dignity. The ST can become a simple instrument to evaluate and improve PS quality, providing more attention on the impact of PS on relatives to then possibly develop new supportive procedures for patients and their families.
2022
30
5
3849
3855
The quality of palliative sedation in end-stage disease: audit from a department of oncology and haematology / Alessia, S.; Matilde, S. F.; Chrystel, I.; Massimiliano, S.; Daniele, D.; Claudia, F.; Raffaella, P.; Flavia, C.; Leonardo, F.; Chiara, C.; Leonardo, P.; Dominici, Massimo; Luppi, Mario; Giuseppe, L.. - In: SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER. - ISSN 0941-4355. - 30:5(2022), pp. 3849-3855. [10.1007/s00520-021-06730-8]
Alessia, S.; Matilde, S. F.; Chrystel, I.; Massimiliano, S.; Daniele, D.; Claudia, F.; Raffaella, P.; Flavia, C.; Leonardo, F.; Chiara, C.; Leonardo, P.; Dominici, Massimo; Luppi, Mario; Giuseppe, L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cade2914-4917-4651-b50e-b22589601c93.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione originale dell'autore proposta per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 515.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
515.43 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1281070
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact