Objectives: The study aimed to assess and compare the global development in six-month-old infants before and during the pandemic restrictive social distancing measures. Methods: This cross-sectional nested study involved infants assessed through the Griffiths Scales of Child Development (GSCD) between September 2019 and April 2021. Infants were classified in a pre-COVID or a COVID group, considering the evaluation date and the restrictive measures in place. GSCD subscales and General Development Scores (GDS) were calculated and compared. Results: One hundred and four healthy term-born infants were evaluated. GDS in the COVID group (n:70; median: 94; IQR: 90–100) appeared significantly lower than in the pre-COVID group (n:34; median: 98; IQR: 97–103; p < 0.001). Language and personal-social-emotional subareas scores appeared the most affected. A decreasing trend of GDS along with the severity of restriction was observed. Conclusion: A reduction in infant development scores was observed during pandemic social distancing. Further studies are needed to systematize these findings and to address effective public health policies for infants and families during long-term forced isolation periods.

The Kids Are Alright (?). Infants’ Development and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study / Ferrari, Eleonora; Palandri, Lucia; Lucaccioni, Laura; Talucci, Giovanna; Passini, Erica; Trevisani, Viola; Righi, Elena. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1661-8564. - 67:(2022), pp. 1-11. [10.3389/ijph.2022.1604804]

The Kids Are Alright (?). Infants’ Development and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Palandri, Lucia
;
Lucaccioni, Laura;Passini, Erica;Trevisani, Viola;Righi, Elena
2022

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to assess and compare the global development in six-month-old infants before and during the pandemic restrictive social distancing measures. Methods: This cross-sectional nested study involved infants assessed through the Griffiths Scales of Child Development (GSCD) between September 2019 and April 2021. Infants were classified in a pre-COVID or a COVID group, considering the evaluation date and the restrictive measures in place. GSCD subscales and General Development Scores (GDS) were calculated and compared. Results: One hundred and four healthy term-born infants were evaluated. GDS in the COVID group (n:70; median: 94; IQR: 90–100) appeared significantly lower than in the pre-COVID group (n:34; median: 98; IQR: 97–103; p < 0.001). Language and personal-social-emotional subareas scores appeared the most affected. A decreasing trend of GDS along with the severity of restriction was observed. Conclusion: A reduction in infant development scores was observed during pandemic social distancing. Further studies are needed to systematize these findings and to address effective public health policies for infants and families during long-term forced isolation periods.
2022
20-giu-2022
67
1
11
The Kids Are Alright (?). Infants’ Development and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study / Ferrari, Eleonora; Palandri, Lucia; Lucaccioni, Laura; Talucci, Giovanna; Passini, Erica; Trevisani, Viola; Righi, Elena. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1661-8564. - 67:(2022), pp. 1-11. [10.3389/ijph.2022.1604804]
Ferrari, Eleonora; Palandri, Lucia; Lucaccioni, Laura; Talucci, Giovanna; Passini, Erica; Trevisani, Viola; Righi, Elena
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ferrari et al 2022 ijph-67-1604804.pdf

Open access

Descrizione: main paper
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1280980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact