Many healthcare interventions are complex, consisting of multiple, possibly interacting, components. Several methodological articles addressing complex interventions in the metaanalytical context have been published. We hereby provide an overview of methods used to evaluate the effects of complex interventions with meta-analytical models. We summarized the methodology, highlighted new developments, and described the benefits, drawbacks, and potential challenges of each identified method. We expect meta-analytical methods focusing on components of several multicomponent interventions to become increasingly popular due to recently developed, easy-to-use, software tools that can be used to conduct the relevant analyses. The different meta-analytical methods are illustrated through two examples comparing psychotherapies for panic disorder. Copyright:

A review of methods for addressing components of interventions in meta-analysis / Petropoulou, M.; Efthimiou, O.; Rucker, G.; Schwarzer, G.; Furukawa, T. A.; Pompoli, A.; Koek, H. L.; Del Giovane, C.; Rodondi, N.; Mavridis, D.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:2(2021), pp. e0246631-N/A. [10.1371/journal.pone.0246631]

A review of methods for addressing components of interventions in meta-analysis

Del Giovane C.;
2021

Abstract

Many healthcare interventions are complex, consisting of multiple, possibly interacting, components. Several methodological articles addressing complex interventions in the metaanalytical context have been published. We hereby provide an overview of methods used to evaluate the effects of complex interventions with meta-analytical models. We summarized the methodology, highlighted new developments, and described the benefits, drawbacks, and potential challenges of each identified method. We expect meta-analytical methods focusing on components of several multicomponent interventions to become increasingly popular due to recently developed, easy-to-use, software tools that can be used to conduct the relevant analyses. The different meta-analytical methods are illustrated through two examples comparing psychotherapies for panic disorder. Copyright:
2021
16
2
e0246631
N/A
A review of methods for addressing components of interventions in meta-analysis / Petropoulou, M.; Efthimiou, O.; Rucker, G.; Schwarzer, G.; Furukawa, T. A.; Pompoli, A.; Koek, H. L.; Del Giovane, C.; Rodondi, N.; Mavridis, D.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:2(2021), pp. e0246631-N/A. [10.1371/journal.pone.0246631]
Petropoulou, M.; Efthimiou, O.; Rucker, G.; Schwarzer, G.; Furukawa, T. A.; Pompoli, A.; Koek, H. L.; Del Giovane, C.; Rodondi, N.; Mavridis, D....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pone.0246631.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.81 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.81 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1279540
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact