Introduction: Information on benefits and risks of drugs is a key element affecting doctors' prescribing decisions. Outreach visits promoting independent information have proved moderately effective in changing prescribing behaviours. Objectives: Testing the short and long-term effectiveness on general practitioners' prescribing of small groups meetings led by pharmacists. Methods: Two cluster open randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were carried out in a large scale NHS setting. Ad hoc prepared evidence based material were used considering a therapeutic area approach - TEA, with information materials on osteoporosis or prostatic hyperplasia - and a single drug oriented approach - SIDRO, with information materials on me-too drugs of 2 different classes: barnidipine or prulifloxacin. In each study, all 115 Primary Care Groups in a Northern Italy area (2.2 million inhabitants, 1737 general practitioners) were randomised to educational small groups meetings, in which available evidence was provided together with drug utilization data and clinical scenarios. Main outcomes were changes in the six-months prescription of targeted drugs. Longer term results (24 and 48 months) were also evaluated. Results: In the TEA trial, one of the four primary outcomes showed a reduction (prescription of alfuzosin compared to tamsulosin and terazosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: prescribing ratio -8.5%, p = 0.03). Another primary outcome (prescription of risedronate) showed a reduction at 24 and 48 months (-7.6%, p = 0.02; and -9,8%, p = 0.03), but not at six months (-5.1%, p = 0.36). In the SIDRO trial both primary outcomes showed a statistically significant reduction (prescription of barnidipine -9.8%, p = 0.02; prescription of prulifloxacin -11.1%, p = 0.04), which persisted or increased over time. Interpretation: These two cluster RCTs showed the large scale feasibility of a complex educational program in a NHS setting, and its potentially relevant long-term impact on prescribing habits, in particular when focusing on a single drug. National Health systems should invest in independent drug information programs. Trial Registration: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN05866587.

Long term effectiveness on prescribing of two multifaceted educational interventions: Results of two large scale randomized cluster trials / Magrini, N.; Formoso, G.; Capelli, O.; Maestri, E.; Nonino, F.; Paltrinieri, B.; Del Giovane, C.; Voci, C.; Magnano, L.; Daya, L.; Marata, A. M.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 9:10(2014), pp. e109915-N/A. [10.1371/journal.pone.0109915]

Long term effectiveness on prescribing of two multifaceted educational interventions: Results of two large scale randomized cluster trials

Formoso G.;Capelli O.;Del Giovane C.;
2014

Abstract

Introduction: Information on benefits and risks of drugs is a key element affecting doctors' prescribing decisions. Outreach visits promoting independent information have proved moderately effective in changing prescribing behaviours. Objectives: Testing the short and long-term effectiveness on general practitioners' prescribing of small groups meetings led by pharmacists. Methods: Two cluster open randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were carried out in a large scale NHS setting. Ad hoc prepared evidence based material were used considering a therapeutic area approach - TEA, with information materials on osteoporosis or prostatic hyperplasia - and a single drug oriented approach - SIDRO, with information materials on me-too drugs of 2 different classes: barnidipine or prulifloxacin. In each study, all 115 Primary Care Groups in a Northern Italy area (2.2 million inhabitants, 1737 general practitioners) were randomised to educational small groups meetings, in which available evidence was provided together with drug utilization data and clinical scenarios. Main outcomes were changes in the six-months prescription of targeted drugs. Longer term results (24 and 48 months) were also evaluated. Results: In the TEA trial, one of the four primary outcomes showed a reduction (prescription of alfuzosin compared to tamsulosin and terazosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: prescribing ratio -8.5%, p = 0.03). Another primary outcome (prescription of risedronate) showed a reduction at 24 and 48 months (-7.6%, p = 0.02; and -9,8%, p = 0.03), but not at six months (-5.1%, p = 0.36). In the SIDRO trial both primary outcomes showed a statistically significant reduction (prescription of barnidipine -9.8%, p = 0.02; prescription of prulifloxacin -11.1%, p = 0.04), which persisted or increased over time. Interpretation: These two cluster RCTs showed the large scale feasibility of a complex educational program in a NHS setting, and its potentially relevant long-term impact on prescribing habits, in particular when focusing on a single drug. National Health systems should invest in independent drug information programs. Trial Registration: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN05866587.
2014
9
10
e109915
N/A
Long term effectiveness on prescribing of two multifaceted educational interventions: Results of two large scale randomized cluster trials / Magrini, N.; Formoso, G.; Capelli, O.; Maestri, E.; Nonino, F.; Paltrinieri, B.; Del Giovane, C.; Voci, C.; Magnano, L.; Daya, L.; Marata, A. M.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 9:10(2014), pp. e109915-N/A. [10.1371/journal.pone.0109915]
Magrini, N.; Formoso, G.; Capelli, O.; Maestri, E.; Nonino, F.; Paltrinieri, B.; Del Giovane, C.; Voci, C.; Magnano, L.; Daya, L.; Marata, A. M....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
file.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1279456
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact