Economic evaluations of the value-for-money of Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) interventions are increasingly important due to growing pressure on healthcare budgets. Although such evaluations are commonplace in the published literature, the number/methodological complexity of different evaluations available, and the challenges specific to MAR interventions, can complicate the interpretation of such analyses for fertility treatments. This article aims to serve as an educational resource and provide context on the design/interpretation of economic analyses for MAR interventions. Several areas are relevant for first-line providers and decision makers: scope of analysis, comparator used, perspective/time horizon considered, outcomes used to measure success, and how results from cost-effectiveness studies can be summarised and used in clinical practice. We aim to help clinicians better understand the strengths/weaknesses of economic analyses, to enable the best use of the evidence in practice, so resources available for MAR interventions can provide maximum value to patients and society.

Economic evaluation of Medically Assisted Reproduction: An educational overview of methods and applications for healthcare professionals / Luyten, J.; Connolly, M. P.; Verbeke, E.; Buhler, K.; Scotland, G.; Lispi, M.; Revelli, A.; Borget, I.; Cedrin-Durnerin, I.; D'Hooghe, T.. - In: BAILLIERE'S BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY. - ISSN 1521-6934. - S1521-6934:22(2022), pp. 00017-00017. [10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.008]

Economic evaluation of Medically Assisted Reproduction: An educational overview of methods and applications for healthcare professionals

Lispi M.;
2022

Abstract

Economic evaluations of the value-for-money of Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) interventions are increasingly important due to growing pressure on healthcare budgets. Although such evaluations are commonplace in the published literature, the number/methodological complexity of different evaluations available, and the challenges specific to MAR interventions, can complicate the interpretation of such analyses for fertility treatments. This article aims to serve as an educational resource and provide context on the design/interpretation of economic analyses for MAR interventions. Several areas are relevant for first-line providers and decision makers: scope of analysis, comparator used, perspective/time horizon considered, outcomes used to measure success, and how results from cost-effectiveness studies can be summarised and used in clinical practice. We aim to help clinicians better understand the strengths/weaknesses of economic analyses, to enable the best use of the evidence in practice, so resources available for MAR interventions can provide maximum value to patients and society.
2022
S1521-6934
22
00017
00017
Economic evaluation of Medically Assisted Reproduction: An educational overview of methods and applications for healthcare professionals / Luyten, J.; Connolly, M. P.; Verbeke, E.; Buhler, K.; Scotland, G.; Lispi, M.; Revelli, A.; Borget, I.; Cedrin-Durnerin, I.; D'Hooghe, T.. - In: BAILLIERE'S BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY. - ISSN 1521-6934. - S1521-6934:22(2022), pp. 00017-00017. [10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.008]
Luyten, J.; Connolly, M. P.; Verbeke, E.; Buhler, K.; Scotland, G.; Lispi, M.; Revelli, A.; Borget, I.; Cedrin-Durnerin, I.; D'Hooghe, T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1521693422000177-main.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 306.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
306.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1272255
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact