Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to prolonged survival for selected patients with colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic role of micro-satellite (MS) status and RAS/RAF mutations for patients treated with CRS. Methods Data were collected from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Clinical and pathologic variables and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational and MS status were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results The study enrolled 437 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. The median OS was 42.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.4-51.2 months], and the median DFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.3-14.9 months). The local (peritoneal) DFS was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.4-24.6 months). In addition to the known clinical factors, KRAS mutations (p = 0.005), BRAF mutations (p = 0.01), and MS status (p = 0.04) were related to survival. The KRAS- and BRAF-mutated patients had a shorter survival than the wild-type (WT) patients (5-year OS, 29.4% and 26.8% vs 51.5%, respectively). The patients with micro-satellite instability (MSI) had a longer survival than the patients with micro-satellite stability (MSS) (5-year OS, 58.3% vs 36.7%). The MSI/WT patients had the best prognosis. The MSS/WT and MSI/mutated patients had similar survivals, whereas the MSS/mutated patients showed the worst prognosis (5-year OS, 70.6%, 48.1%, 23.4%; p = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, OS was related to the Peritoneal Cancer Index [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05 per point], completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (HR, 2.8), N status (HR, 1.6), signet-ring (HR, 2.4), MSI/WT (HR, 0.5), and MSS/WT-MSI/mutation (HR, 0.4). Similar results were obtained for DFS. Conclusion For patients affected by CRC-PM who are eligible for CRS, clinical and pathologic criteria need to be integrated with molecular features (KRAS/BRAF mutation). Micro-satellite status should be strongly considered because MSI confers a survival advantage over MSS, even for mutated patients.

Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) / Marco, Tonello; Dario, Baratti; Paolo, Sammartino; Andrea, Di Giorgio; Manuela, Robella; Cinzia, Sassaroli; Massimo, Framarini; Mario, Valle; Antonio, Macrì; Luigina, Graziosi; Federico, Coccolini; Piero Vincenzo, Lippolis; Gelmini, Roberta; Marcello, Deraco; Daniele, Biacchi; Francesco, Santullo; Marco, Vaira; Katia, Di Lauro; Fabrizio, D'Acapito; Fabio, Carboni; Giuseppe, Giuffrè; Annibale, Donini; Paola, Fugazzola; Pinuccia, Faviana; Sorrentino, Lorena; Antonio, Scapinello; Paola, Del Bianco; Antonio, Sommariva. - In: ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1068-9265. - (2021), pp. 1-13. [10.1245/s10434-021-11045-3]

Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Roberta, Gelmini;
2021

Abstract

Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to prolonged survival for selected patients with colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic role of micro-satellite (MS) status and RAS/RAF mutations for patients treated with CRS. Methods Data were collected from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Clinical and pathologic variables and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational and MS status were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results The study enrolled 437 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. The median OS was 42.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.4-51.2 months], and the median DFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.3-14.9 months). The local (peritoneal) DFS was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.4-24.6 months). In addition to the known clinical factors, KRAS mutations (p = 0.005), BRAF mutations (p = 0.01), and MS status (p = 0.04) were related to survival. The KRAS- and BRAF-mutated patients had a shorter survival than the wild-type (WT) patients (5-year OS, 29.4% and 26.8% vs 51.5%, respectively). The patients with micro-satellite instability (MSI) had a longer survival than the patients with micro-satellite stability (MSS) (5-year OS, 58.3% vs 36.7%). The MSI/WT patients had the best prognosis. The MSS/WT and MSI/mutated patients had similar survivals, whereas the MSS/mutated patients showed the worst prognosis (5-year OS, 70.6%, 48.1%, 23.4%; p = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, OS was related to the Peritoneal Cancer Index [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05 per point], completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (HR, 2.8), N status (HR, 1.6), signet-ring (HR, 2.4), MSI/WT (HR, 0.5), and MSS/WT-MSI/mutation (HR, 0.4). Similar results were obtained for DFS. Conclusion For patients affected by CRC-PM who are eligible for CRS, clinical and pathologic criteria need to be integrated with molecular features (KRAS/BRAF mutation). Micro-satellite status should be strongly considered because MSI confers a survival advantage over MSS, even for mutated patients.
2021
1
13
Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) / Marco, Tonello; Dario, Baratti; Paolo, Sammartino; Andrea, Di Giorgio; Manuela, Robella; Cinzia, Sassaroli; Massimo, Framarini; Mario, Valle; Antonio, Macrì; Luigina, Graziosi; Federico, Coccolini; Piero Vincenzo, Lippolis; Gelmini, Roberta; Marcello, Deraco; Daniele, Biacchi; Francesco, Santullo; Marco, Vaira; Katia, Di Lauro; Fabrizio, D'Acapito; Fabio, Carboni; Giuseppe, Giuffrè; Annibale, Donini; Paola, Fugazzola; Pinuccia, Faviana; Sorrentino, Lorena; Antonio, Scapinello; Paola, Del Bianco; Antonio, Sommariva. - In: ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1068-9265. - (2021), pp. 1-13. [10.1245/s10434-021-11045-3]
Marco, Tonello; Dario, Baratti; Paolo, Sammartino; Andrea, Di Giorgio; Manuela, Robella; Cinzia, Sassaroli; Massimo, Framarini; Mario, Valle; Antonio, Macrì; Luigina, Graziosi; Federico, Coccolini; Piero Vincenzo, Lippolis; Gelmini, Roberta; Marcello, Deraco; Daniele, Biacchi; Francesco, Santullo; Marco, Vaira; Katia, Di Lauro; Fabrizio, D'Acapito; Fabio, Carboni; Giuseppe, Giuffrè; Annibale, Donini; Paola, Fugazzola; Pinuccia, Faviana; Sorrentino, Lorena; Antonio, Scapinello; Paola, Del Bianco; Antonio, Sommariva
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tonello2021_Article_MicrosatelliteAndRASRAFMutatio(1).pdf

Open access

Descrizione: paper
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 390.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
390.11 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1270270
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact