This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.
Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma / Morselli, Paolo; L., Masciotra; Pinto, Valentina; I., Zollino; G., Brunelli; F., Carinci. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1049-2275. - 18:6(2007), pp. 1353-1358. [10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534453]
Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma
PINTO, VALENTINA;
2007
Abstract
This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
18.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
87.85 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
87.85 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
18.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
87.85 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
87.85 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris