This survey experiment examined the role of prejudice and moral licensing as two moderators of the secondary transfer effect (STE) of positive and negative intergroup contact. We collected a quotarandomized sample of 299 majority Finns (52.6% female; experimental condition: n = 118, control condition: n = 181) in order to test whether moral credentials prevent attitude generalization (from primary towards secondary outgroup), particularly among prejudiced individuals. The results showed that STEs of both positive and negative contact were prevented among more prejudiced majority group members who had the possibility to obtain moral credentials in the moral licensing task. These results point at the unstable nature of attitude generalization in STE among prejudiced individuals and at the potential of a normative moral act to intervene into the generalization of intergroup attitudes following intergroup contact. We discuss these findings in relation to the literature on moral licensing and moral reinforcement, framing them in the context of an integration of contact research and research on morality in general.

Conditional secondary transfer effect: The moderating role of prior moral credentials and prejudice / Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga; Vezzali, Loris; Mona, Ranta; Pacilli, Maria Giuseppina; Giacomantonio, Mauro; Pagliaro, Stefano. - In: GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS. - ISSN 1368-4302. - 24:7(2021), pp. 1219-1237. [10.1177/1368430220940401]

Conditional secondary transfer effect: The moderating role of prior moral credentials and prejudice

Vezzali, Loris;
2021

Abstract

This survey experiment examined the role of prejudice and moral licensing as two moderators of the secondary transfer effect (STE) of positive and negative intergroup contact. We collected a quotarandomized sample of 299 majority Finns (52.6% female; experimental condition: n = 118, control condition: n = 181) in order to test whether moral credentials prevent attitude generalization (from primary towards secondary outgroup), particularly among prejudiced individuals. The results showed that STEs of both positive and negative contact were prevented among more prejudiced majority group members who had the possibility to obtain moral credentials in the moral licensing task. These results point at the unstable nature of attitude generalization in STE among prejudiced individuals and at the potential of a normative moral act to intervene into the generalization of intergroup attitudes following intergroup contact. We discuss these findings in relation to the literature on moral licensing and moral reinforcement, framing them in the context of an integration of contact research and research on morality in general.
2021
24
7
1219
1237
Conditional secondary transfer effect: The moderating role of prior moral credentials and prejudice / Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga; Vezzali, Loris; Mona, Ranta; Pacilli, Maria Giuseppina; Giacomantonio, Mauro; Pagliaro, Stefano. - In: GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS. - ISSN 1368-4302. - 24:7(2021), pp. 1219-1237. [10.1177/1368430220940401]
Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga; Vezzali, Loris; Mona, Ranta; Pacilli, Maria Giuseppina; Giacomantonio, Mauro; Pagliaro, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
STE Moral licensing_Main document_GPIR_REVISED_210120-convertito.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: AAM - Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 494.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
494.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1368430220940401.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 366.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
366.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1257347
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact