An accurate model of the factors that contribute to individual differences in reading ability depends on data collection in large, diverse and representative samples of research participants. However, that is rarely feasible due to the constraints imposed by standardized measures of reading ability which require test administration by trained clinicians or researchers. Here we explore whether a simple, two-alternative forced choice, time limited lexical decision task (LDT), self-delivered through the web-browser, can serve as an accurate and reliable measure of reading ability. We found that performance on the LDT is highly correlated with scores on standardized measures of reading ability such as the Woodcock-Johnson Letter Word Identification test (r = 0.91, disattenuated r = 0.94). Importantly, the LDT reading ability measure is highly reliable (r = 0.97). After optimizing the list of words and pseudowords based on item response theory, we found that a short experiment with 76 trials (2–3 min) provides a reliable (r = 0.95) measure of reading ability. Thus, the self-administered, Rapid Online Assessment of Reading ability (ROAR) developed here overcomes the constraints of resource-intensive, in-person reading assessment, and provides an efficient and automated tool for effective online research into the mechanisms of reading (dis)ability.

Rapid online assessment of reading ability / Yeatman, J. D.; Tang, K. A.; Donnelly, P. M.; Yablonski, M.; Ramamurthy, M.; Karipidis, I. I.; Caffarra, S.; Takada, M. E.; Kanopka, K.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Domingue, B. W.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:1(2021), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1038/s41598-021-85907-x]

Rapid online assessment of reading ability

Caffarra S.;
2021

Abstract

An accurate model of the factors that contribute to individual differences in reading ability depends on data collection in large, diverse and representative samples of research participants. However, that is rarely feasible due to the constraints imposed by standardized measures of reading ability which require test administration by trained clinicians or researchers. Here we explore whether a simple, two-alternative forced choice, time limited lexical decision task (LDT), self-delivered through the web-browser, can serve as an accurate and reliable measure of reading ability. We found that performance on the LDT is highly correlated with scores on standardized measures of reading ability such as the Woodcock-Johnson Letter Word Identification test (r = 0.91, disattenuated r = 0.94). Importantly, the LDT reading ability measure is highly reliable (r = 0.97). After optimizing the list of words and pseudowords based on item response theory, we found that a short experiment with 76 trials (2–3 min) provides a reliable (r = 0.95) measure of reading ability. Thus, the self-administered, Rapid Online Assessment of Reading ability (ROAR) developed here overcomes the constraints of resource-intensive, in-person reading assessment, and provides an efficient and automated tool for effective online research into the mechanisms of reading (dis)ability.
2021
11
1
N/A
N/A
Rapid online assessment of reading ability / Yeatman, J. D.; Tang, K. A.; Donnelly, P. M.; Yablonski, M.; Ramamurthy, M.; Karipidis, I. I.; Caffarra, S.; Takada, M. E.; Kanopka, K.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Domingue, B. W.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:1(2021), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1038/s41598-021-85907-x]
Yeatman, J. D.; Tang, K. A.; Donnelly, P. M.; Yablonski, M.; Ramamurthy, M.; Karipidis, I. I.; Caffarra, S.; Takada, M. E.; Kanopka, K.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Domingue, B. W.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-021-85907-x.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1252396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact