BACKGROUND Surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represent two possible strategy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Milan criteria. AIM To evaluate short- A nd long-term outcome in elderly patients (70 years) with HCC in Milan criteria, which underwent liver resection (LR) or RFA. METHODS The study included 594 patients with HCC in Milan criteria (429 in LR group and 165 in RFA group) managed in 10 European centers. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression. RESULTS After PSM, we compared 136 patients in the LR group with 136 patients in the RFA group. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91%, 80%, and 76% in the LR group and 97%, 67%, and 41% in the RFA group respectively (P = 0.001). Diseasefree survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 84%, 60% and 44% for the LR group, and 63%, 36%, and 25% for the RFA group (P = 0.001).Postoperative Clavien-Dindo IIIIV complications were lower in the RFA group (1% vs 11%, P = 0.001) in association with a shorter length of stay (2 d vs 7 d, P = 0.001).In multivariate analysis, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (10) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.89], increased value of international normalized ratio (1.3) (OR = 1.60), treatment with radiofrequency (OR = 1.46) ,and multiple nodules (OR = 1.19) were independent predictors of a poor overall survival while a high MELD score (10) (OR = 1.51) and radiofrequency (OR = 1.37) were independent factors associated with a higher recurrence rate. CONCLUSION Despite a longer length of stay and a higher rate of severe postoperative complications, surgery provided better results in long-term oncological outcomes as compared to ablation in elderly patients (70 years) with HCC in Milan criteria. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Radiofrequency ablation vs surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Milan criteria / Conticchio, M.; Inchingolo, R.; Delvecchio, A.; Laera, L.; Ratti, F.; Gelli, M.; Anelli, F.; Laurent, A.; Vitali, G.; Magistri, P.; Assirati, G.; Felli, E.; Wakabayashi, T.; Pessaux, P.; Piardi, T.; di Benedetto, F.; De'Angelis, N.; Briceno&, Tild; Rampoldi, A.; Adam, R.; Cherqui, D.; Aldrighetti, L. A.; Memeo, R.. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 1007-9327. - 27:18(2021), pp. 2205-2218. [10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2205]

Radiofrequency ablation vs surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Milan criteria

Magistri P.;di Benedetto F.;
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND Surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represent two possible strategy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Milan criteria. AIM To evaluate short- A nd long-term outcome in elderly patients (70 years) with HCC in Milan criteria, which underwent liver resection (LR) or RFA. METHODS The study included 594 patients with HCC in Milan criteria (429 in LR group and 165 in RFA group) managed in 10 European centers. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression. RESULTS After PSM, we compared 136 patients in the LR group with 136 patients in the RFA group. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91%, 80%, and 76% in the LR group and 97%, 67%, and 41% in the RFA group respectively (P = 0.001). Diseasefree survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 84%, 60% and 44% for the LR group, and 63%, 36%, and 25% for the RFA group (P = 0.001).Postoperative Clavien-Dindo IIIIV complications were lower in the RFA group (1% vs 11%, P = 0.001) in association with a shorter length of stay (2 d vs 7 d, P = 0.001).In multivariate analysis, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (10) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.89], increased value of international normalized ratio (1.3) (OR = 1.60), treatment with radiofrequency (OR = 1.46) ,and multiple nodules (OR = 1.19) were independent predictors of a poor overall survival while a high MELD score (10) (OR = 1.51) and radiofrequency (OR = 1.37) were independent factors associated with a higher recurrence rate. CONCLUSION Despite a longer length of stay and a higher rate of severe postoperative complications, surgery provided better results in long-term oncological outcomes as compared to ablation in elderly patients (70 years) with HCC in Milan criteria. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
2021
27
18
2205
2218
Radiofrequency ablation vs surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Milan criteria / Conticchio, M.; Inchingolo, R.; Delvecchio, A.; Laera, L.; Ratti, F.; Gelli, M.; Anelli, F.; Laurent, A.; Vitali, G.; Magistri, P.; Assirati, G.; Felli, E.; Wakabayashi, T.; Pessaux, P.; Piardi, T.; di Benedetto, F.; De'Angelis, N.; Briceno&, Tild; Rampoldi, A.; Adam, R.; Cherqui, D.; Aldrighetti, L. A.; Memeo, R.. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 1007-9327. - 27:18(2021), pp. 2205-2218. [10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2205]
Conticchio, M.; Inchingolo, R.; Delvecchio, A.; Laera, L.; Ratti, F.; Gelli, M.; Anelli, F.; Laurent, A.; Vitali, G.; Magistri, P.; Assirati, G.; Felli, E.; Wakabayashi, T.; Pessaux, P.; Piardi, T.; di Benedetto, F.; De'Angelis, N.; Briceno&, Tild; Rampoldi, A.; Adam, R.; Cherqui, D.; Aldrighetti, L. A.; Memeo, R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
WJG-27-2205.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1249413
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact