Objective: The number of invasive procedures (chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis) for fetal testing is decreasing because of the availability of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) leading to a centralisation of prenatal diagnostic services to accredited fetal medicine centres. A new survey was conducted 10 years after the previous one to update the current clinical practice among clinicians who regularly perform CVS. Method: Consultants from 32 centres in the United Kingdom were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating: The total number of CVS procedures carried out in the unit in a typical week, the preferred route (transabdominal [TA] vs transcervical [TC]), technique (use of local anaesthetic [LA] and needle technique). Results: Response rate was 96.9%; TA was the preferred route (96.8%) in all centres except one. Single-needle technique is used exclusively in half the centres (51.6%). LA is used by most operators (90.3%) before the procedure. Three centres did not routinely use LA for CVS. Conclusions: Operators across the United Kingdom almost exclusively use the TA route for CVS with single-needle technique in 51.6% of cases. The use of LA prior to CVS is a very common practice in the United Kingdom.
A survey of current clinical practice of chorionic villus sampling / Sileo, F. G.; Curado, J.; Bhide, A.. - In: PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS. - ISSN 0197-3851. - 39:4(2019), pp. 299-302. [10.1002/pd.5425]
A survey of current clinical practice of chorionic villus sampling
Sileo F. G.;
2019
Abstract
Objective: The number of invasive procedures (chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis) for fetal testing is decreasing because of the availability of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) leading to a centralisation of prenatal diagnostic services to accredited fetal medicine centres. A new survey was conducted 10 years after the previous one to update the current clinical practice among clinicians who regularly perform CVS. Method: Consultants from 32 centres in the United Kingdom were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating: The total number of CVS procedures carried out in the unit in a typical week, the preferred route (transabdominal [TA] vs transcervical [TC]), technique (use of local anaesthetic [LA] and needle technique). Results: Response rate was 96.9%; TA was the preferred route (96.8%) in all centres except one. Single-needle technique is used exclusively in half the centres (51.6%). LA is used by most operators (90.3%) before the procedure. Three centres did not routinely use LA for CVS. Conclusions: Operators across the United Kingdom almost exclusively use the TA route for CVS with single-needle technique in 51.6% of cases. The use of LA prior to CVS is a very common practice in the United Kingdom.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
FGS_Bhide2019.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
215.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
215.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris