Background: Limited knowledge of stem cell therapies‘ mechanisms of action hampers their sustainable implementation into the clinic. Specifically, the interactions of transplanted stem cells with the host vasculature and its implications for their therapeutic efficacy are not elucidated. We tested whether adhesion receptors and chemokine receptors on stem cells can be functionally modulated, and consequently if such modulation may substantially affect therapeutically relevant stem cell interactions with the host endothelium. Methods: We investigated the effects of cationic molecule polyethylenimine (PEI) treatment with or without nanoparticles on the functions of adhesion receptors and chemokine receptors of human bone marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC). Analyses included MSC functions in vitro, as well as homing and therapeutic efficacy in rodent models of central nervous system´s pathologies in vivo. Findings: PEI treatment did not affect viability, immunomodulation or differentiation potential of MSC, but increased the CCR4 expression and functionally blocked their adhesion receptors, thus decreasing their adhesion capacity in vitro. Intravenously applied in a rat model of brain injury, the homing rate of PEI-MSC in the brain was highly increased with decreased numbers of adherent PEI-MSC in the lung vasculature. Moreover, in comparison to untreated MSC, PEI-MSC featured increased tumour directed migration in a mouse glioblastoma model, and superior therapeutic efficacy in a murine model of stroke. Interpretation: Balanced stem cell adhesion and migration in different parts of the vasculature and tissues together with the local microenvironment impacts their therapeutic efficacy. Funding: Robert Bosch Stiftung, IZEPHA grant, EU grant 7 FP Health

Modulating endothelial adhesion and migration impacts stem cell therapies efficacy / Schafer, R.; Schwab, M.; Siegel, G.; von Ameln-Mayerhofer, A.; Buadze, M.; Lourhmati, A.; Wendel, H. -P.; Kluba, T.; Krueger, M. A.; Calaminus, C.; Scheer, E.; Dominici, M.; Grisendi, G.; Doeppner, T. R.; Schlechter, J.; Finzel, A. K.; Gross, D.; Klaffschenkel, R.; Gehring, F. K.; Spohn, G.; Kretschmer, A.; Bieback, K.; Kramer-Albers, E. -M.; Barth, K.; Eckert, A.; Elser, S.; Schmehl, J.; Claussen, C. D.; Seifried, E.; Hermann, D. M.; Northoff, H.; Danielyan, L.. - In: EBIOMEDICINE. - ISSN 2352-3964. - 60:(2020), pp. 102987-102999. [10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102987]

Modulating endothelial adhesion and migration impacts stem cell therapies efficacy

Dominici M.;Grisendi G.;
2020

Abstract

Background: Limited knowledge of stem cell therapies‘ mechanisms of action hampers their sustainable implementation into the clinic. Specifically, the interactions of transplanted stem cells with the host vasculature and its implications for their therapeutic efficacy are not elucidated. We tested whether adhesion receptors and chemokine receptors on stem cells can be functionally modulated, and consequently if such modulation may substantially affect therapeutically relevant stem cell interactions with the host endothelium. Methods: We investigated the effects of cationic molecule polyethylenimine (PEI) treatment with or without nanoparticles on the functions of adhesion receptors and chemokine receptors of human bone marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC). Analyses included MSC functions in vitro, as well as homing and therapeutic efficacy in rodent models of central nervous system´s pathologies in vivo. Findings: PEI treatment did not affect viability, immunomodulation or differentiation potential of MSC, but increased the CCR4 expression and functionally blocked their adhesion receptors, thus decreasing their adhesion capacity in vitro. Intravenously applied in a rat model of brain injury, the homing rate of PEI-MSC in the brain was highly increased with decreased numbers of adherent PEI-MSC in the lung vasculature. Moreover, in comparison to untreated MSC, PEI-MSC featured increased tumour directed migration in a mouse glioblastoma model, and superior therapeutic efficacy in a murine model of stroke. Interpretation: Balanced stem cell adhesion and migration in different parts of the vasculature and tissues together with the local microenvironment impacts their therapeutic efficacy. Funding: Robert Bosch Stiftung, IZEPHA grant, EU grant 7 FP Health
2020
60
102987
102999
Modulating endothelial adhesion and migration impacts stem cell therapies efficacy / Schafer, R.; Schwab, M.; Siegel, G.; von Ameln-Mayerhofer, A.; Buadze, M.; Lourhmati, A.; Wendel, H. -P.; Kluba, T.; Krueger, M. A.; Calaminus, C.; Scheer, E.; Dominici, M.; Grisendi, G.; Doeppner, T. R.; Schlechter, J.; Finzel, A. K.; Gross, D.; Klaffschenkel, R.; Gehring, F. K.; Spohn, G.; Kretschmer, A.; Bieback, K.; Kramer-Albers, E. -M.; Barth, K.; Eckert, A.; Elser, S.; Schmehl, J.; Claussen, C. D.; Seifried, E.; Hermann, D. M.; Northoff, H.; Danielyan, L.. - In: EBIOMEDICINE. - ISSN 2352-3964. - 60:(2020), pp. 102987-102999. [10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102987]
Schafer, R.; Schwab, M.; Siegel, G.; von Ameln-Mayerhofer, A.; Buadze, M.; Lourhmati, A.; Wendel, H. -P.; Kluba, T.; Krueger, M. A.; Calaminus, C.; Scheer, E.; Dominici, M.; Grisendi, G.; Doeppner, T. R.; Schlechter, J.; Finzel, A. K.; Gross, D.; Klaffschenkel, R.; Gehring, F. K.; Spohn, G.; Kretschmer, A.; Bieback, K.; Kramer-Albers, E. -M.; Barth, K.; Eckert, A.; Elser, S.; Schmehl, J.; Claussen, C. D.; Seifried, E.; Hermann, D. M.; Northoff, H.; Danielyan, L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS2352396420303637_ebiomed.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.98 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.98 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1239245
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact