Can language relatedness be established without cognate words? This question has remained unresolved since the nineteenth century, leaving language prehistory beyond etymologically established families largely undefined. We address this problem through a theory of universal syntactic characters. We show that not only does syntax allow for comparison across distinct traditional language families, but that the probability of deeper historical relatedness between such families can be statistically tested through a dedicated algorithm which implements the concept of 'possible languages' suggested by a formal syntactic theory. Controversial clusters such as e.g. Altaic and Uralo-Altaic are significantly supported by our test, while other possible macro-groupings, e.g. Indo-Uralic or Basque-(Northeast) Caucasian, prove to be indistinguishable from a randomly generated distribution of language distances. These results suggest that syntactic diversity, modelled through a generative biolinguistic framework, can be used to provide a proof of historical relationship between different families irrespectively of the presence of a common lexicon from which regular sound correspondences can be determined; therefore, we argue that syntax may expand the time limits imposed by the classical comparative method. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reconstructing prehistoric languages'.

At the boundaries of syntactic prehistory / Ceolin, Andrea; Guardiano, Cristina; Longobardi, Giuseppe; Irimia, Monica Alexandrina; Bortolussi, Luca; Sgarro, Andrea. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS - ROYAL SOCIETY. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0962-8436. - 376:1824(2021), pp. 1-10. [10.1098/rstb.2020.0197]

At the boundaries of syntactic prehistory

Ceolin, Andrea;Guardiano, Cristina;Irimia, Monica Alexandrina;
2021

Abstract

Can language relatedness be established without cognate words? This question has remained unresolved since the nineteenth century, leaving language prehistory beyond etymologically established families largely undefined. We address this problem through a theory of universal syntactic characters. We show that not only does syntax allow for comparison across distinct traditional language families, but that the probability of deeper historical relatedness between such families can be statistically tested through a dedicated algorithm which implements the concept of 'possible languages' suggested by a formal syntactic theory. Controversial clusters such as e.g. Altaic and Uralo-Altaic are significantly supported by our test, while other possible macro-groupings, e.g. Indo-Uralic or Basque-(Northeast) Caucasian, prove to be indistinguishable from a randomly generated distribution of language distances. These results suggest that syntactic diversity, modelled through a generative biolinguistic framework, can be used to provide a proof of historical relationship between different families irrespectively of the presence of a common lexicon from which regular sound correspondences can be determined; therefore, we argue that syntax may expand the time limits imposed by the classical comparative method. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reconstructing prehistoric languages'.
2021
22-mar-2021
376
1824
1
10
At the boundaries of syntactic prehistory / Ceolin, Andrea; Guardiano, Cristina; Longobardi, Giuseppe; Irimia, Monica Alexandrina; Bortolussi, Luca; Sgarro, Andrea. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS - ROYAL SOCIETY. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0962-8436. - 376:1824(2021), pp. 1-10. [10.1098/rstb.2020.0197]
Ceolin, Andrea; Guardiano, Cristina; Longobardi, Giuseppe; Irimia, Monica Alexandrina; Bortolussi, Luca; Sgarro, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
(2021)Transactions.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo Principale
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 491.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
491.41 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
(2021)Trans_SuppMat.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Electronic Supplementary Material
Tipologia: Altro
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1238996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact