The categories of vulnerability and discrimination reveal particularly relevant within disability studies. The latter shed light on the phenomenon of “vulnerabilisation” of given legal entities by means of the traditional tools of Legal Theory (e.g. legal capacity and legal capacity to act). By combining vulnerability studies with those on intersectionality, there opens up the possibility of rethinking subjectivity behind persons with disabilities: in this regard, crucial sparks emerge from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) of 2006, as well as generally speaking from the so called “social model”. Rethinking subjectivity forces to rethink the rights standard, based both on an inclusive idea of human dignity and on the relevance of material bodies. By means of these approaches, there emerges also the possibility of rethinking intellectual and psychosocial disability issues underlying psychical suffering as a state of vulnerability. This calls for dealing carefully with the peculiar tool of “social dangerousness”, which is likely to lead – as is the case for compulsory mental health treatment – to a violation of human rights of persons with disabilities.
Disability and law / Casadei, T.. - In: RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 2280-482X. - 7:2(2018), pp. 273-279. [10.4477/91675]
Disability and law
Casadei T.
2018
Abstract
The categories of vulnerability and discrimination reveal particularly relevant within disability studies. The latter shed light on the phenomenon of “vulnerabilisation” of given legal entities by means of the traditional tools of Legal Theory (e.g. legal capacity and legal capacity to act). By combining vulnerability studies with those on intersectionality, there opens up the possibility of rethinking subjectivity behind persons with disabilities: in this regard, crucial sparks emerge from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) of 2006, as well as generally speaking from the so called “social model”. Rethinking subjectivity forces to rethink the rights standard, based both on an inclusive idea of human dignity and on the relevance of material bodies. By means of these approaches, there emerges also the possibility of rethinking intellectual and psychosocial disability issues underlying psychical suffering as a state of vulnerability. This calls for dealing carefully with the peculiar tool of “social dangerousness”, which is likely to lead – as is the case for compulsory mental health treatment – to a violation of human rights of persons with disabilities.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2280-482X-27745-6.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
190.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
190.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris