The categories of vulnerability and discrimination reveal particularly relevant within disability studies. The latter shed light on the phenomenon of “vulnerabilisation” of given legal entities by means of the traditional tools of Legal Theory (e.g. legal capacity and legal capacity to act). By combining vulnerability studies with those on intersectionality, there opens up the possibility of rethinking subjectivity behind persons with disabilities: in this regard, crucial sparks emerge from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) of 2006, as well as generally speaking from the so called “social model”. Rethinking subjectivity forces to rethink the rights standard, based both on an inclusive idea of human dignity and on the relevance of material bodies. By means of these approaches, there emerges also the possibility of rethinking intellectual and psychosocial disability issues underlying psychical suffering as a state of vulnerability. This calls for dealing carefully with the peculiar tool of “social dangerousness”, which is likely to lead – as is the case for compulsory mental health treatment – to a violation of human rights of persons with disabilities.

Disability and law / Casadei, T.. - In: RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 2280-482X. - 7:2(2018), pp. 273-279. [10.4477/91675]

Disability and law

Casadei T.
2018

Abstract

The categories of vulnerability and discrimination reveal particularly relevant within disability studies. The latter shed light on the phenomenon of “vulnerabilisation” of given legal entities by means of the traditional tools of Legal Theory (e.g. legal capacity and legal capacity to act). By combining vulnerability studies with those on intersectionality, there opens up the possibility of rethinking subjectivity behind persons with disabilities: in this regard, crucial sparks emerge from the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) of 2006, as well as generally speaking from the so called “social model”. Rethinking subjectivity forces to rethink the rights standard, based both on an inclusive idea of human dignity and on the relevance of material bodies. By means of these approaches, there emerges also the possibility of rethinking intellectual and psychosocial disability issues underlying psychical suffering as a state of vulnerability. This calls for dealing carefully with the peculiar tool of “social dangerousness”, which is likely to lead – as is the case for compulsory mental health treatment – to a violation of human rights of persons with disabilities.
2018
7
2
273
279
Disability and law / Casadei, T.. - In: RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 2280-482X. - 7:2(2018), pp. 273-279. [10.4477/91675]
Casadei, T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2280-482X-27745-6.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 190.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
190.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1228872
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact