With the rise of Industry 4.0 and of the Industrial Internet, the computing and communication infrastructures achieved an essential role within process and factory automation, and cyberphysical systems in general. In this scenario, the OPC UA standard is currently becoming a widespread opportunity to enable interoperability among heterogeneous industrial systems. Nonetheless, OPC UA is characterized by a complex protocol architecture, that may impair the scalability of applications and may represent a bottleneck for its effective implementation in resource-constrained devices, such as low-cost industrial embedded systems. Several different OPC UA implementations are available, which in some significant cases are released under an open source license. In this context, the aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of the performance provided by some of these different OPC UA implementations, focusing specifically on potential development and resource bottlenecks. The analysis is carried out through an extensive experimental campaign explicitly targeting general purpose low-cost embedded systems. The final goal is to provide a comprehensive performance comparisons to allow devising some useful practical guidelines.

Comparative assessment of different OPC UA open-source stacks for embedded systems / Cenedese, A.; Frodella, M.; Tramarin, F.; Vitturi, S.. - 2019-:(2019), pp. 1127-1134. (Intervento presentato al convegno 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2019 tenutosi a esp nel 2019) [10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869187].

Comparative assessment of different OPC UA open-source stacks for embedded systems

Tramarin F.;
2019

Abstract

With the rise of Industry 4.0 and of the Industrial Internet, the computing and communication infrastructures achieved an essential role within process and factory automation, and cyberphysical systems in general. In this scenario, the OPC UA standard is currently becoming a widespread opportunity to enable interoperability among heterogeneous industrial systems. Nonetheless, OPC UA is characterized by a complex protocol architecture, that may impair the scalability of applications and may represent a bottleneck for its effective implementation in resource-constrained devices, such as low-cost industrial embedded systems. Several different OPC UA implementations are available, which in some significant cases are released under an open source license. In this context, the aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of the performance provided by some of these different OPC UA implementations, focusing specifically on potential development and resource bottlenecks. The analysis is carried out through an extensive experimental campaign explicitly targeting general purpose low-cost embedded systems. The final goal is to provide a comprehensive performance comparisons to allow devising some useful practical guidelines.
2019
24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2019
esp
2019
2019-
1127
1134
Cenedese, A.; Frodella, M.; Tramarin, F.; Vitturi, S.
Comparative assessment of different OPC UA open-source stacks for embedded systems / Cenedese, A.; Frodella, M.; Tramarin, F.; Vitturi, S.. - 2019-:(2019), pp. 1127-1134. (Intervento presentato al convegno 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2019 tenutosi a esp nel 2019) [10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869187].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1201980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact