Objectives To identify if maternal educational attainment is a prognostic factor for gestational weight gain (GWG), and to determine the differential effects of lifestyle interventions (diet based, physical activity based or mixed approach) on GWG, stratified by educational attainment. Design Individual participant data meta-Analysis using the previously established International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group database (https://iwipgroup.wixsite.com/collaboration). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data Statement guidelines were followed. Data sources Major electronic databases, from inception to February 2017. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials on diet and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy. Maternal educational attainment was required for inclusion and was categorised as higher education (≥tertiary) or lower education (≤secondary). Risk of bias Cochrane risk of bias tool was used. Data synthesis Principle measures of effect were OR and regression coefficient. Results Of the 36 randomised controlled trials in the i-WIP database, 21 trials and 5183 pregnant women were included. Women with lower educational attainment had an increased risk of excessive (OR 1.182; 95% CI 1.008 to 1.385, p =0.039) and inadequate weight gain (OR 1.284; 95% CI 1.045 to 1.577, p =0.017). Among women with lower education, diet basedinterventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.515; 95% CI 0.339 to 0.785, p = 0.002) and inadequate weight gain (OR 0.504; 95% CI 0.288 to 0.884, p=0.017), and reduced kg/week gain (B-0.055; 95% CI-0.098 to-0.012, p=0.012). Mixed interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain for women with lower education (OR 0.735; 95% CI 0.561 to 0.963, p=0.026). Among women with high education, diet based interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.609; 95% CI 0.437 to 0.849, p=0.003), and mixed interventions reduced kg/week gain (B-0.053; 95% CI-0.069 to-0.037,p<0.001). Physical activity based interventions did not impact GWG when stratified by education. Conclusions Pregnant women with lower education are at an increased risk of excessive and inadequate GWG. Diet based interventions seem the most appropriate choice for these women, and additional support through mixed interventions may also be beneficial.

Impact of maternal education on response to lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: Individual participant data meta-Analysis / O'Brien, E. C.; Segurado, R.; Geraghty, A. A.; Alberdi, G.; Rogozinska, E.; Astrup, A.; Barakat Carballo, R.; Bogaerts, A.; Cecatti, J. G.; Coomarasamy, A.; De Groot, C. J. M.; Devlieger, R.; Dodd, J. M.; El Beltagy, N.; Facchinetti, F.; Geiker, N.; Guelfi, K.; Haakstad, L.; Harrison, C.; Hauner, H.; Jensen, D. M.; Khan, K.; Kinnunen, T. I.; Luoto, R.; Willem Mol, B.; Morkved, S.; Motahari-Tabari, N.; Owens, J. A.; Perales, M.; Petrella, E.; Phelan, S.; Poston, L.; Rauh, K.; Rayanagoudar, G.; Renault, K. M.; Ruifrok, A. E.; Sagedal, L.; Salvesen, K. A.; Scudeller, T. T.; Shen, G.; Shub, A.; Stafne, S. N.; Surita, F. G.; Thangaratinam, S.; Tonstad, S.; Van Poppel, M. N. M.; Vinter, C.; Vistad, I.; Yeo, S.; Mcauliffe, F. M.. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 9:8(2019), pp. e025620-e025623. [10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025620]

Impact of maternal education on response to lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: Individual participant data meta-Analysis

Bogaerts A.;Facchinetti F.;Khan K.;Petrella E.;
2019

Abstract

Objectives To identify if maternal educational attainment is a prognostic factor for gestational weight gain (GWG), and to determine the differential effects of lifestyle interventions (diet based, physical activity based or mixed approach) on GWG, stratified by educational attainment. Design Individual participant data meta-Analysis using the previously established International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group database (https://iwipgroup.wixsite.com/collaboration). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data Statement guidelines were followed. Data sources Major electronic databases, from inception to February 2017. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials on diet and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy. Maternal educational attainment was required for inclusion and was categorised as higher education (≥tertiary) or lower education (≤secondary). Risk of bias Cochrane risk of bias tool was used. Data synthesis Principle measures of effect were OR and regression coefficient. Results Of the 36 randomised controlled trials in the i-WIP database, 21 trials and 5183 pregnant women were included. Women with lower educational attainment had an increased risk of excessive (OR 1.182; 95% CI 1.008 to 1.385, p =0.039) and inadequate weight gain (OR 1.284; 95% CI 1.045 to 1.577, p =0.017). Among women with lower education, diet basedinterventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.515; 95% CI 0.339 to 0.785, p = 0.002) and inadequate weight gain (OR 0.504; 95% CI 0.288 to 0.884, p=0.017), and reduced kg/week gain (B-0.055; 95% CI-0.098 to-0.012, p=0.012). Mixed interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain for women with lower education (OR 0.735; 95% CI 0.561 to 0.963, p=0.026). Among women with high education, diet based interventions reduced risk of excessive weight gain (OR 0.609; 95% CI 0.437 to 0.849, p=0.003), and mixed interventions reduced kg/week gain (B-0.053; 95% CI-0.069 to-0.037,p<0.001). Physical activity based interventions did not impact GWG when stratified by education. Conclusions Pregnant women with lower education are at an increased risk of excessive and inadequate GWG. Diet based interventions seem the most appropriate choice for these women, and additional support through mixed interventions may also be beneficial.
2019
9
8
e025620
e025623
Impact of maternal education on response to lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: Individual participant data meta-Analysis / O'Brien, E. C.; Segurado, R.; Geraghty, A. A.; Alberdi, G.; Rogozinska, E.; Astrup, A.; Barakat Carballo, R.; Bogaerts, A.; Cecatti, J. G.; Coomarasamy, A.; De Groot, C. J. M.; Devlieger, R.; Dodd, J. M.; El Beltagy, N.; Facchinetti, F.; Geiker, N.; Guelfi, K.; Haakstad, L.; Harrison, C.; Hauner, H.; Jensen, D. M.; Khan, K.; Kinnunen, T. I.; Luoto, R.; Willem Mol, B.; Morkved, S.; Motahari-Tabari, N.; Owens, J. A.; Perales, M.; Petrella, E.; Phelan, S.; Poston, L.; Rauh, K.; Rayanagoudar, G.; Renault, K. M.; Ruifrok, A. E.; Sagedal, L.; Salvesen, K. A.; Scudeller, T. T.; Shen, G.; Shub, A.; Stafne, S. N.; Surita, F. G.; Thangaratinam, S.; Tonstad, S.; Van Poppel, M. N. M.; Vinter, C.; Vistad, I.; Yeo, S.; Mcauliffe, F. M.. - In: BMJ OPEN. - ISSN 2044-6055. - 9:8(2019), pp. e025620-e025623. [10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025620]
O'Brien, E. C.; Segurado, R.; Geraghty, A. A.; Alberdi, G.; Rogozinska, E.; Astrup, A.; Barakat Carballo, R.; Bogaerts, A.; Cecatti, J. G.; Coomarasam...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
e025620.full.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 492.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
492.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1201803
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact