Background: Outcomes for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who fail to achieve complete response (CR) or relapse after front-line therapy are poor with lack of prospective outcomes data. Objectives: COMPLETE is a prospective registry of 499 patients enrolled at academic and community sites in the United States detailing patient demographics, treatment and outcomes for patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas. We report results for patients with primary refractory and relapsed disease. Methods: Primary refractory disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment (induction ± maintenance or consolidation/transplant) other than CR, and included a partial response, progressive disease, or no response/stable disease. Relapsed disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment of CR, followed by disease progression at a later date, irrespective of time to progression. Patients were included in the analysis if initial treatment began within 30 days of enrollment and treatment duration was ≥4 days. Results: Of 420 evaluable patients, 97 met the definition for primary refractory and 58 with relapsed disease. In the second-line setting, relapsed patients received single-agent therapies more often than refractory patients (52 vs. 28%; p = 0.01) and were more likely to receive single-agent regimens (74 vs. 53%; p = 0.03). The objective response rate to second-line therapy was higher in relapsed patients (61 vs. 40%; p = 0.04) as was the proportion achieving a CR (41 vs. 14%; p = 0.002). Further, relapsed patients had longer overall survival (OS) compared to refractory patients, with a median OS of 29.1 versus 12.3 months. Conclusions: Despite the availability of newer active single agents, refractory patients were less likely to receive these therapies and continue to have inferior outcomes compared to those with relapsed disease. PTCL in the real world remains an unmet medical need, and improvements in front-line therapies are needed.

Outcomes for Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients after Front-Line Therapy from the COMPLETE Registry / Lansigan, F.; Horwitz, S. M.; Pinter-Brown, L. C.; Rosen, S. T.; Pro, B.; Hsi, E. D.; Federico, M.; Gisselbrecht, C.; Schwartz, M.; Bellm, L. A.; Acosta, M.; Shustov, A. R.; Advani, R. H.; Feldman, T.; Lechowicz, M. J.; Smith, S. M.; Tulpule, A.; Craig, M. D.; Greer, J. P.; Kahl, B. S.; Leach, J. W.; Morganstein, N.; Casulo, C.; Park, S. I.; Foss, F. M.. - In: ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0001-5792. - 143:1(2020), pp. 40-50. [10.1159/000500666]

Outcomes for Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients after Front-Line Therapy from the COMPLETE Registry

Federico M.;
2020

Abstract

Background: Outcomes for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who fail to achieve complete response (CR) or relapse after front-line therapy are poor with lack of prospective outcomes data. Objectives: COMPLETE is a prospective registry of 499 patients enrolled at academic and community sites in the United States detailing patient demographics, treatment and outcomes for patients with aggressive T cell lymphomas. We report results for patients with primary refractory and relapsed disease. Methods: Primary refractory disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment (induction ± maintenance or consolidation/transplant) other than CR, and included a partial response, progressive disease, or no response/stable disease. Relapsed disease was defined as an evaluable best response to initial treatment of CR, followed by disease progression at a later date, irrespective of time to progression. Patients were included in the analysis if initial treatment began within 30 days of enrollment and treatment duration was ≥4 days. Results: Of 420 evaluable patients, 97 met the definition for primary refractory and 58 with relapsed disease. In the second-line setting, relapsed patients received single-agent therapies more often than refractory patients (52 vs. 28%; p = 0.01) and were more likely to receive single-agent regimens (74 vs. 53%; p = 0.03). The objective response rate to second-line therapy was higher in relapsed patients (61 vs. 40%; p = 0.04) as was the proportion achieving a CR (41 vs. 14%; p = 0.002). Further, relapsed patients had longer overall survival (OS) compared to refractory patients, with a median OS of 29.1 versus 12.3 months. Conclusions: Despite the availability of newer active single agents, refractory patients were less likely to receive these therapies and continue to have inferior outcomes compared to those with relapsed disease. PTCL in the real world remains an unmet medical need, and improvements in front-line therapies are needed.
2020
17-lug-2019
143
1
40
50
Outcomes for Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients after Front-Line Therapy from the COMPLETE Registry / Lansigan, F.; Horwitz, S. M.; Pinter-Brown, L. C.; Rosen, S. T.; Pro, B.; Hsi, E. D.; Federico, M.; Gisselbrecht, C.; Schwartz, M.; Bellm, L. A.; Acosta, M.; Shustov, A. R.; Advani, R. H.; Feldman, T.; Lechowicz, M. J.; Smith, S. M.; Tulpule, A.; Craig, M. D.; Greer, J. P.; Kahl, B. S.; Leach, J. W.; Morganstein, N.; Casulo, C.; Park, S. I.; Foss, F. M.. - In: ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0001-5792. - 143:1(2020), pp. 40-50. [10.1159/000500666]
Lansigan, F.; Horwitz, S. M.; Pinter-Brown, L. C.; Rosen, S. T.; Pro, B.; Hsi, E. D.; Federico, M.; Gisselbrecht, C.; Schwartz, M.; Bellm, L. A.; Acos...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
465.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 328.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
328.27 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1201641
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact