Background. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) improves exercise capacity, oxygen saturation and symptoms in severe COPD. We wondered whether additional HFOT during training was more effective than oxygen through a Venturi Mask (V-mask) in improving exercise capacity in people with COPD and chronic respiratory failure (CRF). Methods. Patients (n=171) were randomized to receive either HFOT or oxygen through a V-mask at iso inspiratory oxygen fraction during the same intensity exercise training program. Pre- and post-training endurance time (Tlim), six minutes walking distance (6MWD), respiratory and limb muscle strength, arterial blood gases, Barthel and Barthel Dyspnea Indices, COPD Assessment Test, Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results. Due to 15.4% and 24.1% dropout rates, 71 and 66 patients were analyzed in the HFOT and V-mask groups, respectively. Exercise capacity significantly improved after training in both groups with similar patients’ satisfaction. The improvement in 6MWD, (with 18 meters as mean difference between groups) but not in Tlim, was significantly higher in the HFOT group (p=0.029). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of Tlim was reached by 44% of V-mask and 56% of HFOT patients (p=0.867), whereas the MCID of 6MWD post-training was reached by 51% of V-mask and 69% of HFOT patients respectively (p= 0.036). 

High flow oxygen therapy during exercise training in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure: a multicenter randomised trial / Vitacca, Michele; Paneroni, Mara; Zampogna, Elisabetta; Visca, Dina; Carlucci, Annalisa; Cirio, Serena; Banfi, Paolo; Pappacoda, Gabriele; Trianni, Ludovico; Brogneri, Antonio; Belli, Stefano; Paracchini, Elena; Aliani, Maria; Spinelli, Vito; Gigliotti, Francesco; Lanini, Barbara; Lazzeri, Marta; Clini, Enrico; Ambrosino, Nicolino. - In: PHYSICAL THERAPY. - ISSN 0031-9023. - 100:8(2020), pp. 1249-1259. [10.1093/ptj/pzaa076]

High flow oxygen therapy during exercise training in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure: a multicenter randomised trial.

Enrico Clini;
2020

Abstract

Background. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) improves exercise capacity, oxygen saturation and symptoms in severe COPD. We wondered whether additional HFOT during training was more effective than oxygen through a Venturi Mask (V-mask) in improving exercise capacity in people with COPD and chronic respiratory failure (CRF). Methods. Patients (n=171) were randomized to receive either HFOT or oxygen through a V-mask at iso inspiratory oxygen fraction during the same intensity exercise training program. Pre- and post-training endurance time (Tlim), six minutes walking distance (6MWD), respiratory and limb muscle strength, arterial blood gases, Barthel and Barthel Dyspnea Indices, COPD Assessment Test, Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results. Due to 15.4% and 24.1% dropout rates, 71 and 66 patients were analyzed in the HFOT and V-mask groups, respectively. Exercise capacity significantly improved after training in both groups with similar patients’ satisfaction. The improvement in 6MWD, (with 18 meters as mean difference between groups) but not in Tlim, was significantly higher in the HFOT group (p=0.029). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of Tlim was reached by 44% of V-mask and 56% of HFOT patients (p=0.867), whereas the MCID of 6MWD post-training was reached by 51% of V-mask and 69% of HFOT patients respectively (p= 0.036). 
2020
25-apr-2020
100
8
1249
1259
High flow oxygen therapy during exercise training in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure: a multicenter randomised trial / Vitacca, Michele; Paneroni, Mara; Zampogna, Elisabetta; Visca, Dina; Carlucci, Annalisa; Cirio, Serena; Banfi, Paolo; Pappacoda, Gabriele; Trianni, Ludovico; Brogneri, Antonio; Belli, Stefano; Paracchini, Elena; Aliani, Maria; Spinelli, Vito; Gigliotti, Francesco; Lanini, Barbara; Lazzeri, Marta; Clini, Enrico; Ambrosino, Nicolino. - In: PHYSICAL THERAPY. - ISSN 0031-9023. - 100:8(2020), pp. 1249-1259. [10.1093/ptj/pzaa076]
Vitacca, Michele; Paneroni, Mara; Zampogna, Elisabetta; Visca, Dina; Carlucci, Annalisa; Cirio, Serena; Banfi, Paolo; Pappacoda, Gabriele; Trianni, Ludovico; Brogneri, Antonio; Belli, Stefano; Paracchini, Elena; Aliani, Maria; Spinelli, Vito; Gigliotti, Francesco; Lanini, Barbara; Lazzeri, Marta; Clini, Enrico; Ambrosino, Nicolino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PTJ pzaa076-2020 (accepted).pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
pzaa076.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 793.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
793.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1201516
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact