Since the first Earth Day in the 1970s, corporate environmental performance has increased dramatically, and cases of greenwashing have increased sharply. The term greenwash refers to a variety of different misleading communications that aim to form overly positive beliefs among stakeholders about a company's environmental practices. The growing number of corporate social responsibility claims, whether founded or not, creates difficulties for stakeholders in distinguishing between truly positive business performance and companies that only appear to embrace a model of sustainable development. In this context, through the lens of legitimacy and signalling theory, we intend to understand and assess the different influences that various types of misleading communications about environmental issues have on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and greenwashing. Stakeholder responses to an environmental scandal will also be assessed. The hypotheses tested through a four-for-two design experiment reveal that different levels of greenwashing have a significantly different influence on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and stakeholders' reactions to environmental scandals.

Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions / Torelli, R.; Balluchi, F.; Lazzini, A.. - In: BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0964-4733. - 29:2(2020), pp. 407-421. [10.1002/bse.2373]

Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions

Lazzini A.
2020

Abstract

Since the first Earth Day in the 1970s, corporate environmental performance has increased dramatically, and cases of greenwashing have increased sharply. The term greenwash refers to a variety of different misleading communications that aim to form overly positive beliefs among stakeholders about a company's environmental practices. The growing number of corporate social responsibility claims, whether founded or not, creates difficulties for stakeholders in distinguishing between truly positive business performance and companies that only appear to embrace a model of sustainable development. In this context, through the lens of legitimacy and signalling theory, we intend to understand and assess the different influences that various types of misleading communications about environmental issues have on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and greenwashing. Stakeholder responses to an environmental scandal will also be assessed. The hypotheses tested through a four-for-two design experiment reveal that different levels of greenwashing have a significantly different influence on stakeholders' perceptions of corporate environmental responsibility and stakeholders' reactions to environmental scandals.
2020
14-ago-2019
29
2
407
421
Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions / Torelli, R.; Balluchi, F.; Lazzini, A.. - In: BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0964-4733. - 29:2(2020), pp. 407-421. [10.1002/bse.2373]
Torelli, R.; Balluchi, F.; Lazzini, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PRE PRINT_Greenwashing and Environmental Communication.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione originale dell'autore proposta per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 411.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
411.71 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Bus Strat Env - 2019 - Torelli - Greenwashing and environmental communication Effects on stakeholders perceptions.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 893.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
893.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1197669
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 225
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 193
social impact