One hundred seventy-nine patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive either ProMACE-CytaBOM (P-C) or MACOP-B (M-B). At last follow-up 71 patients in the P-C arm and 78 in the M-B arm were assessable for response. Forty-one patients treated with P-C (58%) and 49 patients treated with M-B (63%) achieved a CR. Moreover 18 and 22 patients achieved PR with P-C and M-B, respectively. Twenty-five patients relapsed, 12 in the P-C arm and 13 in the M-B arm. Thirty-nine patients died, 32 from disease progression, 5 from treatment related causes, and 2 from other causes. No differences between the two treatment groups were observed as regard to relapse or death-rate. At 27 months the survival rate was of 71.9% for patients treated with P-C and 70.7% for those treated with M-B. At 2 years the RFD rate was 64% and 60% for patients in P-C and M-B arm, respectively. Patients treated with M-B experienced an high rate of methotrexate-related toxicity. ProMACE-CytaBOM and M-B seem provided with similar activity. However P-C seem less toxic and more manageable in an outpatient setting.

PROMACE-CYTABOM VERSUS MACOP-B IN INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE NHL - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL / Federico, Massimo; Moretti, G; Gobbi, Pg; Avanzini, P; Cavanna, L; Carotenuto, M; Lombardo, M; Leone, G; Pitini, V; Abbadessa, V; Ascari, E; Silingardi, Vittorio; Mauri, C.. - In: LEUKEMIA. - ISSN 0887-6924. - STAMPA. - 5 (1):(1991), pp. 95-101.

PROMACE-CYTABOM VERSUS MACOP-B IN INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE NHL - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

FEDERICO, Massimo;SILINGARDI, Vittorio;
1991

Abstract

One hundred seventy-nine patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive either ProMACE-CytaBOM (P-C) or MACOP-B (M-B). At last follow-up 71 patients in the P-C arm and 78 in the M-B arm were assessable for response. Forty-one patients treated with P-C (58%) and 49 patients treated with M-B (63%) achieved a CR. Moreover 18 and 22 patients achieved PR with P-C and M-B, respectively. Twenty-five patients relapsed, 12 in the P-C arm and 13 in the M-B arm. Thirty-nine patients died, 32 from disease progression, 5 from treatment related causes, and 2 from other causes. No differences between the two treatment groups were observed as regard to relapse or death-rate. At 27 months the survival rate was of 71.9% for patients treated with P-C and 70.7% for those treated with M-B. At 2 years the RFD rate was 64% and 60% for patients in P-C and M-B arm, respectively. Patients treated with M-B experienced an high rate of methotrexate-related toxicity. ProMACE-CytaBOM and M-B seem provided with similar activity. However P-C seem less toxic and more manageable in an outpatient setting.
1991
5 (1)
95
101
PROMACE-CYTABOM VERSUS MACOP-B IN INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE NHL - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL / Federico, Massimo; Moretti, G; Gobbi, Pg; Avanzini, P; Cavanna, L; Carotenuto, M; Lombardo, M; Leone, G; Pitini, V; Abbadessa, V; Ascari, E; Silingardi, Vittorio; Mauri, C.. - In: LEUKEMIA. - ISSN 0887-6924. - STAMPA. - 5 (1):(1991), pp. 95-101.
Federico, Massimo; Moretti, G; Gobbi, Pg; Avanzini, P; Cavanna, L; Carotenuto, M; Lombardo, M; Leone, G; Pitini, V; Abbadessa, V; Ascari, E; Silingardi, Vittorio; Mauri, C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Promace-Cytabom vs.....pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 2.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/11914
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact