This article shows that the problem of defeasibility hinges on a more fundamental issue about the source of authority of moral reasons. It argues that the legitimate source of moral authority is rationality, and that rational justification deploys universal principles. However, normative defeasibility raises important issues about the possibility of practical inferences. As an alternative, a non standard version of Kantian constructivism is defended.

Defeaters and practical knowledge / Bagnoli, Carla. - In: SYNTHESE. - ISSN 0039-7857. - STAMPA. - 195:7(2018), pp. 2855-2875. [10.1007/s11229-016-1095-z]

Defeaters and practical knowledge

BAGNOLI, Carla
2018

Abstract

This article shows that the problem of defeasibility hinges on a more fundamental issue about the source of authority of moral reasons. It argues that the legitimate source of moral authority is rationality, and that rational justification deploys universal principles. However, normative defeasibility raises important issues about the possibility of practical inferences. As an alternative, a non standard version of Kantian constructivism is defended.
2018
29-apr-2016
195
7
2855
2875
Defeaters and practical knowledge / Bagnoli, Carla. - In: SYNTHESE. - ISSN 0039-7857. - STAMPA. - 195:7(2018), pp. 2855-2875. [10.1007/s11229-016-1095-z]
Bagnoli, Carla
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BAGNOLI_Defeaters and practical knowledge.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Versione editoriale
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 554.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
554.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1188812
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact