Background Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides dynamic information and allows in vivo monitoring, with excellent histologic correlation. In the last decade, the use of RCM for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) has been reported. CTCL may require multiple biopsies for diagnosis due to its equivocal clinical presentation. RCM was described as a possible tool to help determine the best site for skin biopsy. This study aims to systematically review all RCM features reported in literature for CTCL. Method A systematic literature search concerning CTCL evaluated by RCM was performed in eight electronic databases until May 2019 following PRISMA-DTA quality assessment. Results Eighteen RCM features were described in patients with CTCL. The most frequent were: interface dermatitis (89%), epidermal lymphocytes (82%), epidermal architectural disarray (81%), and vesicle-like structure (Pautrier microabscess) (51%). Conclusion In order to establish comparable parameters among the studies identified, we proposed descriptors for CTCL features and a grading system to quantify them. This will facilitate to define the role of RCM in the diagnosis and monitoring of CTCL patients.

Systematic review and proposal of an in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy assessment tool for cutaneous lymphoma / Melhoranse Gouveia, B.; Wells, J.; Kim, J.; Consuegra, G.; Longo, C.; Fernandez-Penas, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0303-6987. - 47:3(2020), pp. 295-304. [10.1111/cup.13598]

Systematic review and proposal of an in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy assessment tool for cutaneous lymphoma

Longo C.;
2020

Abstract

Background Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides dynamic information and allows in vivo monitoring, with excellent histologic correlation. In the last decade, the use of RCM for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) has been reported. CTCL may require multiple biopsies for diagnosis due to its equivocal clinical presentation. RCM was described as a possible tool to help determine the best site for skin biopsy. This study aims to systematically review all RCM features reported in literature for CTCL. Method A systematic literature search concerning CTCL evaluated by RCM was performed in eight electronic databases until May 2019 following PRISMA-DTA quality assessment. Results Eighteen RCM features were described in patients with CTCL. The most frequent were: interface dermatitis (89%), epidermal lymphocytes (82%), epidermal architectural disarray (81%), and vesicle-like structure (Pautrier microabscess) (51%). Conclusion In order to establish comparable parameters among the studies identified, we proposed descriptors for CTCL features and a grading system to quantify them. This will facilitate to define the role of RCM in the diagnosis and monitoring of CTCL patients.
2020
16-ott-2019
47
3
295
304
Systematic review and proposal of an in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy assessment tool for cutaneous lymphoma / Melhoranse Gouveia, B.; Wells, J.; Kim, J.; Consuegra, G.; Longo, C.; Fernandez-Penas, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0303-6987. - 47:3(2020), pp. 295-304. [10.1111/cup.13598]
Melhoranse Gouveia, B.; Wells, J.; Kim, J.; Consuegra, G.; Longo, C.; Fernandez-Penas, P.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
materials-12-03461-v2.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 4.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1184490
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact