In recent years, the research community devoted many resources to define accurate methodologies to model the real physics behind turbulent combustion. Such effort aims at reducing the need for case-by-case calibration in internal combustion engine simulations. In the present work two of the most widespread combustion models in the engine modelling community are compared, namely ECFM-3Z and G-equation. The interaction of turbulent flows with combustion chemistry is investigated and understood. In particular, the heat release rate characterizing combustion, and therefore the identification of a flame front, is analysed based on flame surface density concept rather than algebraic correlations for turbulent burn rate. In the first part, spark-ignition (S.I.) combustion is simulated in an optically accessible GDI single-cylinder research engine in firing conditions. The turbulent combustion regime is mapped on the Borghi-Peters diagram for all the conditions experienced by the engine flame, and the consistency of the two combustion models is critically analysed. In the second part, a simple test case is defined to test the two combustion models in an ideally turbulence-controlled environment: this allows to fully understand the main differences between the two combustion models under well-monitored conditions. and results are compared against experimental databases of turbulent burn rate for wide ranges of Damkohler (Da) and Karlovitz (Ka) numbers. The joint experimental and numerical study presented in this paper evaluates different approaches within the unified flamelet/non-flamelet framework for modelling turbulent combustion in SI engines. It also indicates guidelines for reduced calibration effort in widespread combustion models.
Analysis and Simulation of Non-Flamelet Turbulent Combustion in a Research Optical Engine / Iacovano, Clara; D'Adamo, Alessandro; Cantore, Giuseppe. - In: ENERGY PROCEDIA. - ISSN 1876-6102. - 148:(2018), pp. 463-470. (Intervento presentato al convegno 73rd Conference of the Italian Thermal Machines Engineering Association, ATI 2018 tenutosi a ita nel 2018) [10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.121].
Analysis and Simulation of Non-Flamelet Turbulent Combustion in a Research Optical Engine
IACOVANO, CLARA;D'Adamo, Alessandro;Cantore, Giuseppe
2018
Abstract
In recent years, the research community devoted many resources to define accurate methodologies to model the real physics behind turbulent combustion. Such effort aims at reducing the need for case-by-case calibration in internal combustion engine simulations. In the present work two of the most widespread combustion models in the engine modelling community are compared, namely ECFM-3Z and G-equation. The interaction of turbulent flows with combustion chemistry is investigated and understood. In particular, the heat release rate characterizing combustion, and therefore the identification of a flame front, is analysed based on flame surface density concept rather than algebraic correlations for turbulent burn rate. In the first part, spark-ignition (S.I.) combustion is simulated in an optically accessible GDI single-cylinder research engine in firing conditions. The turbulent combustion regime is mapped on the Borghi-Peters diagram for all the conditions experienced by the engine flame, and the consistency of the two combustion models is critically analysed. In the second part, a simple test case is defined to test the two combustion models in an ideally turbulence-controlled environment: this allows to fully understand the main differences between the two combustion models under well-monitored conditions. and results are compared against experimental databases of turbulent burn rate for wide ranges of Damkohler (Da) and Karlovitz (Ka) numbers. The joint experimental and numerical study presented in this paper evaluates different approaches within the unified flamelet/non-flamelet framework for modelling turbulent combustion in SI engines. It also indicates guidelines for reduced calibration effort in widespread combustion models.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Energy Procedia Volume 148, August 2018, Pages 463-470.pdf
Open access
Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.52 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.52 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris