Surgery is the treatment of choice in most head and neck cancers. Very often, the surgery is radical with high impact on the psychosocial, functional and aesthetic fields. The aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the patient's, clinician's and key informant's point of view when surgery is proposed, to improve the quality of pathways in terms of patients' practical, psychological and relational needs. We followed a Grounded Theory approach with semi-structured interviews. Seventeen participants (six patients, nine healthcare professionals and two volunteers) were interviewed immediately before surgery. The study generated a process of "persuading the patient of an obligation" as the core category. The other principal categories that emerged highlighted the patients' doubts and fears regarding the surgery consequences and, in parallel, strategies employed by the healthcare professionals to rebut hindering issues impeding surgery. In particular, healthcare professionals involved patients in an affiliation process through simplified communication to sustain the choice of surgery; the family plays a supportive role in this process. The interplay between the organisational process and patients' experience results in "I will let you convince me" at the end of the decision-making process, where the main aim was to save and be saved.

Undergoing head and neck cancer surgery: A grounded theory / Losi, Elisabetta; Guberti, Monica; Ghirotto, Luca; Di Leo, Silvia; Bassi, Maria C; Costi, Stefania. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE. - ISSN 0961-5423. - (2019), pp. e13062-e13062. [10.1111/ecc.13062]

Undergoing head and neck cancer surgery: A grounded theory

Losi, Elisabetta;Guberti, Monica;GHIROTTO, LUCA;DI LEO, SILVIA;Bassi, Maria C
;
Costi, Stefania
2019

Abstract

Surgery is the treatment of choice in most head and neck cancers. Very often, the surgery is radical with high impact on the psychosocial, functional and aesthetic fields. The aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the patient's, clinician's and key informant's point of view when surgery is proposed, to improve the quality of pathways in terms of patients' practical, psychological and relational needs. We followed a Grounded Theory approach with semi-structured interviews. Seventeen participants (six patients, nine healthcare professionals and two volunteers) were interviewed immediately before surgery. The study generated a process of "persuading the patient of an obligation" as the core category. The other principal categories that emerged highlighted the patients' doubts and fears regarding the surgery consequences and, in parallel, strategies employed by the healthcare professionals to rebut hindering issues impeding surgery. In particular, healthcare professionals involved patients in an affiliation process through simplified communication to sustain the choice of surgery; the family plays a supportive role in this process. The interplay between the organisational process and patients' experience results in "I will let you convince me" at the end of the decision-making process, where the main aim was to save and be saved.
26-apr-2019
e13062
e13062
Undergoing head and neck cancer surgery: A grounded theory / Losi, Elisabetta; Guberti, Monica; Ghirotto, Luca; Di Leo, Silvia; Bassi, Maria C; Costi, Stefania. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE. - ISSN 0961-5423. - (2019), pp. e13062-e13062. [10.1111/ecc.13062]
Losi, Elisabetta; Guberti, Monica; Ghirotto, Luca; Di Leo, Silvia; Bassi, Maria C; Costi, Stefania
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
_system_appendPDF_proof_hi.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: pre-print
Tipologia: Pre-print dell'autore (bozza pre referaggio)
Dimensione 604.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1176398
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact