The paper discusses and presents an alternative interpretation to Penelope Maddy’s reading of G.E. Moore’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s anti-skeptical strategies as proposed in her book What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy. It connects this discussion with the methodological claims Maddy puts forward and offers an alternative to her therapeutic reading of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty.

What Do Philosophers Do? Maddy, Moore and Wittgenstein / Coliva, A.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF SKEPTICISM. - ISSN 2210-5700. - 8:3(2018), pp. 198-207. [10.1163/22105700-20181341]

What Do Philosophers Do? Maddy, Moore and Wittgenstein

A. Coliva
2018

Abstract

The paper discusses and presents an alternative interpretation to Penelope Maddy’s reading of G.E. Moore’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s anti-skeptical strategies as proposed in her book What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy. It connects this discussion with the methodological claims Maddy puts forward and offers an alternative to her therapeutic reading of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty.
2018
8
3
198
207
What Do Philosophers Do? Maddy, Moore and Wittgenstein / Coliva, A.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF SKEPTICISM. - ISSN 2210-5700. - 8:3(2018), pp. 198-207. [10.1163/22105700-20181341]
Coliva, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SKEP_Adv_1341_Coliva - Maddy.pdf

Open access

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 136.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
136.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1175042
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact