Background: Planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) may be time consuming and its use is limited by available staff resources. Automated multicriterial treatment planning can eliminate this bottleneck. We compared automatically created (auto) VMAT plans generated by Erasmus-iCycle to manually created VMAT plans for treatment of spinal metastases. Methods: Forty-two targets in 32 patients were analyzed. Lungs and kidneys were defined as organs at risk (OARs). Twenty-two patients received radiotherapy on kidney levels, 17 on lung levels, and 3 on both levels. Results: All Erasmus-iCycle plans were clinically acceptable. When compared to manual plans, planning target volume (PTV) coverage of auto plans was significantly better. The Homogeneity Index did not differ significantly between the groups. Mean dose to OARs was lower in auto plans concerning both kidneys and the left lung. One hotspot (>110% of D50%) occurred in the spinal cord of one auto plan (33.2 Gy, D50%: 30 Gy). Treatment time was 7% longer in auto plans. Conclusions: Erasmus-iCycle plans showed better target coverage and sparing of OARs at the expense of minimally longer treatment times (for which no constraint was set).

Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases - A comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation / Buergy, Daniel; Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M.; Heijmen, Ben J. M.; Voet, Peter W. J.; Breedveld, Sebastiaan; Wenz, Frederik; Lohr, Frank; Stieler, Florian. - In: RADIATION ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1748-717X. - 12:1(2017), pp. 1-7. [10.1186/s13014-017-0767-2]

Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases - A comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation

Lohr, Frank;
2017

Abstract

Background: Planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) may be time consuming and its use is limited by available staff resources. Automated multicriterial treatment planning can eliminate this bottleneck. We compared automatically created (auto) VMAT plans generated by Erasmus-iCycle to manually created VMAT plans for treatment of spinal metastases. Methods: Forty-two targets in 32 patients were analyzed. Lungs and kidneys were defined as organs at risk (OARs). Twenty-two patients received radiotherapy on kidney levels, 17 on lung levels, and 3 on both levels. Results: All Erasmus-iCycle plans were clinically acceptable. When compared to manual plans, planning target volume (PTV) coverage of auto plans was significantly better. The Homogeneity Index did not differ significantly between the groups. Mean dose to OARs was lower in auto plans concerning both kidneys and the left lung. One hotspot (>110% of D50%) occurred in the spinal cord of one auto plan (33.2 Gy, D50%: 30 Gy). Treatment time was 7% longer in auto plans. Conclusions: Erasmus-iCycle plans showed better target coverage and sparing of OARs at the expense of minimally longer treatment times (for which no constraint was set).
12
1
1
7
Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases - A comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation / Buergy, Daniel; Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M.; Heijmen, Ben J. M.; Voet, Peter W. J.; Breedveld, Sebastiaan; Wenz, Frederik; Lohr, Frank; Stieler, Florian. - In: RADIATION ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1748-717X. - 12:1(2017), pp. 1-7. [10.1186/s13014-017-0767-2]
Buergy, Daniel; Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M.; Heijmen, Ben J. M.; Voet, Peter W. J.; Breedveld, Sebastiaan; Wenz, Frederik; Lohr, Frank; Stieler, Florian
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13014-017-0767-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 2.26 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.26 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1172300
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact