We report a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n = 25), matched unrelated (n = 25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n = 10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 68 months), outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB arm versus the FT arm were as follows: PFS, 43% versus 55% (P =.28); overall survival (OS), 54% versus 70% (P =.17); relapse/progression, 36% versus 24% (P =.24); nonrelapse mortality (NRM), 21% in both arms (P =.99); and graft failure, 14% versus 10% (P =.96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P =.03). Both neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were significantly influenced by previous splenectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.51; P =.02) and splenomegaly at transplantation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.94; P =.03). In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.
Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group / Patriarca, Francesca; Masciulli, Arianna; Bacigalupo, Andrea; Bregante, Stefania; Pavoni, Chiara; Finazzi, Maria Chiara; Bosi, Alberto; Russo, Domenico; Narni, Franco; Messina, Giuseppe; Alessandrino, Emilio Paolo; Carella, Angelo Michele; Milone, Giuseppe; Bruno, Benedetto; Mammoliti, Sonia; Bruno, Barbara; Fanin, Renato; Bonifazi, Francesca; Rambaldi, Alessandro. - In: BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1083-8791. - 25:5(2019), pp. 932-940. [10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.064]
Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group
Narni, Franco;
2019
Abstract
We report a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n = 25), matched unrelated (n = 25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n = 10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 68 months), outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB arm versus the FT arm were as follows: PFS, 43% versus 55% (P =.28); overall survival (OS), 54% versus 70% (P =.17); relapse/progression, 36% versus 24% (P =.24); nonrelapse mortality (NRM), 21% in both arms (P =.99); and graft failure, 14% versus 10% (P =.96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P =.03). Both neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were significantly influenced by previous splenectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.51; P =.02) and splenomegaly at transplantation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.94; P =.03). In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Patriarca et al_Biol Blood Mar Transpl 2019.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.08 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
VOR_Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.18 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris