Through the definition and the elaboration of his political philosophy, Hobbes wishes to present himself as a relevant representative of the new mechanistic and deterministic science of the seventeenth century, by applying Galilei’s method in politics and by refusing the Aristotelian metaphysic and natural philosophy as well. The aim of the present article is to challenge this claim combining two complementary survey paths: on the one hand, an analysis both of the image of the State-Leviathan and of the modality of the exercise of sovereignty; on the other hand, a comparison between the Hobbesian and the Spinozian natural law theory. In addition to a mechanistic image of the State-Leviathan as guarantee of security, protection, and well-being, it emerges a personalist image of the sovereign who exercises his absolute power by suspending the validity of positive laws. As a result, Hobbes’s thought seems to be characterised by an original co-existence of decisionism and mechanism and his view of the natural law does not appear to be based on deterministic principles, but on a voluntarist and moral character condensed in his theory of passions.

Ipotesi sul meccanicismo politico. Tra Hobbes e Spinoza / Altini, Carlo. - In: FILOSOFIA POLITICA. - ISSN 0394-7297. - XXXII:3(2018), pp. 409-426. [10.1416/91304]

Ipotesi sul meccanicismo politico. Tra Hobbes e Spinoza

Altini Carlo
2018

Abstract

Through the definition and the elaboration of his political philosophy, Hobbes wishes to present himself as a relevant representative of the new mechanistic and deterministic science of the seventeenth century, by applying Galilei’s method in politics and by refusing the Aristotelian metaphysic and natural philosophy as well. The aim of the present article is to challenge this claim combining two complementary survey paths: on the one hand, an analysis both of the image of the State-Leviathan and of the modality of the exercise of sovereignty; on the other hand, a comparison between the Hobbesian and the Spinozian natural law theory. In addition to a mechanistic image of the State-Leviathan as guarantee of security, protection, and well-being, it emerges a personalist image of the sovereign who exercises his absolute power by suspending the validity of positive laws. As a result, Hobbes’s thought seems to be characterised by an original co-existence of decisionism and mechanism and his view of the natural law does not appear to be based on deterministic principles, but on a voluntarist and moral character condensed in his theory of passions.
2018
XXXII
3
409
426
Ipotesi sul meccanicismo politico. Tra Hobbes e Spinoza / Altini, Carlo. - In: FILOSOFIA POLITICA. - ISSN 0394-7297. - XXXII:3(2018), pp. 409-426. [10.1416/91304]
Altini, Carlo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
saggio Altini - Hobbes e Spinoza su meccanicismo.pdf

Open Access dal 01/02/2023

Tipologia: Versione originale dell'autore proposta per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 178.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
178.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
saggio Altini (rivisto).pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 587.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
587.57 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1167879
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact