Urinary incontinence is still one of the major drawbacks following radical prostatectomy. It is considered even more bothersome than erectile dysfunction, even if its incidence is lower. According to the 2015 EAU guidelines mean continence rates at 12 months range from 89 to 100% for patients treated with robot-assisted RP (RARP) to 80-97% for patients treated with retropubic RP (Guidelines on prostate cancer, Arnhem, 2015).

Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter / Rocco, Bernardo; Grasso, Angelica A. C.; De Lorenzis, Elisa; Sandri, Marco; Bianchi, Giampaolo. - (2018), pp. 363-374. [10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_32]

Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter

Rocco, Bernardo;Sandri, Marco;Bianchi, Giampaolo
2018-01-01

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is still one of the major drawbacks following radical prostatectomy. It is considered even more bothersome than erectile dysfunction, even if its incidence is lower. According to the 2015 EAU guidelines mean continence rates at 12 months range from 89 to 100% for patients treated with robot-assisted RP (RARP) to 80-97% for patients treated with retropubic RP (Guidelines on prostate cancer, Arnhem, 2015).
Robotic Urology, Third Edition
9783319658643
Springer International Publishing
Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter / Rocco, Bernardo; Grasso, Angelica A. C.; De Lorenzis, Elisa; Sandri, Marco; Bianchi, Giampaolo. - (2018), pp. 363-374. [10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_32]
Rocco, Bernardo; Grasso, Angelica A. C.; De Lorenzis, Elisa; Sandri, Marco; Bianchi, Giampaolo
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1166146
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact