Accurate assessments of biodiversity are crucial to advising ecosystem-monitoring programs and understanding ecosystem function. Nevertheless, a standard operating procedure to assess biodiversity accurately and consistently has not been established. This is especially true for meiofauna, a diverse community (>20 phyla) of small benthic invertebrates that have fundamental ecological roles. Recent studies show that metabarcoding is a cost-effective and timeeffective method to estimate meiofauna biodiversity, in contrast to morphological-based taxonomy. Here, we compare biodiversity assessments of a diverse meiofaunal community derived by applying multiple taxonomic methods based on comparative morphology, molecular phylogenetic analysis, DNA barcoding of individual specimens, and metabarcoding of environmental DNA. We show that biodiversity estimates are strongly biased across taxonomic methods and phyla. Such biases affect understanding of community structures and ecological interpretations. This study supports the urgency of improving aspects of environmental high-throughput sequencing and the value of taxonomists in correctly understanding biodiversity estimates.

Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach / Leasi, Francesca; Sevigny, Joseph L.; Laflamme, Eric M.; Artois, Tom; Curini-Galletti, Marco; de Jesus Navarrete, Alberto; Di Domenico, Maikon; Goetz, Freya; Hall, Jeffrey A.; Hochberg, Rick; Jörger, Katharina M.; Jondelius, Ulf; Todaro, M. Antonio; Wirshing, Herman H.; Norenburg, Jon L.; Thomas, W. Kelley. - In: COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY. - ISSN 2399-3642. - 1:1(2018), pp. 1-12. [10.1038/s42003-018-0119-2]

Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach

Todaro, M. Antonio;
2018

Abstract

Accurate assessments of biodiversity are crucial to advising ecosystem-monitoring programs and understanding ecosystem function. Nevertheless, a standard operating procedure to assess biodiversity accurately and consistently has not been established. This is especially true for meiofauna, a diverse community (>20 phyla) of small benthic invertebrates that have fundamental ecological roles. Recent studies show that metabarcoding is a cost-effective and timeeffective method to estimate meiofauna biodiversity, in contrast to morphological-based taxonomy. Here, we compare biodiversity assessments of a diverse meiofaunal community derived by applying multiple taxonomic methods based on comparative morphology, molecular phylogenetic analysis, DNA barcoding of individual specimens, and metabarcoding of environmental DNA. We show that biodiversity estimates are strongly biased across taxonomic methods and phyla. Such biases affect understanding of community structures and ecological interpretations. This study supports the urgency of improving aspects of environmental high-throughput sequencing and the value of taxonomists in correctly understanding biodiversity estimates.
1
1
1
12
Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach / Leasi, Francesca; Sevigny, Joseph L.; Laflamme, Eric M.; Artois, Tom; Curini-Galletti, Marco; de Jesus Navarrete, Alberto; Di Domenico, Maikon; Goetz, Freya; Hall, Jeffrey A.; Hochberg, Rick; Jörger, Katharina M.; Jondelius, Ulf; Todaro, M. Antonio; Wirshing, Herman H.; Norenburg, Jon L.; Thomas, W. Kelley. - In: COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY. - ISSN 2399-3642. - 1:1(2018), pp. 1-12. [10.1038/s42003-018-0119-2]
Leasi, Francesca; Sevigny, Joseph L.; Laflamme, Eric M.; Artois, Tom; Curini-Galletti, Marco; de Jesus Navarrete, Alberto; Di Domenico, Maikon; Goetz, Freya; Hall, Jeffrey A.; Hochberg, Rick; Jörger, Katharina M.; Jondelius, Ulf; Todaro, M. Antonio; Wirshing, Herman H.; Norenburg, Jon L.; Thomas, W. Kelley
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Leasi et al-2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 2.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.6 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/1164826
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact